Targeting depression circuitry with H1 coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: a retrospective circuit mapping study

被引:0
作者
Baldi, Samantha [1 ,2 ]
Chiulli, Nicole [1 ]
Palm, Stephan [1 ]
Frandsen, Summer [1 ]
Pell, Gaby S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zibman, Samuel [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Rodriguez-Ponde, Josias [1 ]
Brown, Joshua C. [2 ,6 ]
Siddiqi, Shan H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Brain Circuit Therapeut, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Life Sci, Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Zlotowski Ctr Neurosci, Beer Sheva, Israel
[5] BrainsWay Ltd, Jerusalem, Israel
[6] McLean Hosp, Transcranial Magnet Stimulat Serv, Belmont, MA USA
关键词
IDENTIFICATION; CONNECTIVITY; DISORDERS; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES; TMS;
D O I
10.1038/s41386-025-02157-5
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for depression may depend on targeting specific brain circuits. However, this has not been tested for TMS with the H1 coil, a widely used device believed to target more broadly and deeply than TMS with figure-of-8 coils. This study examined whether targeting a specific brain circuit with H1 coil TMS treatment may impact depressive symptom improvement. We retrospectively analyzed data from 97 patients at McLean Hospital, who received at least 19 TMS sessions and had incidentally completed an anatomical brain MRI. We modeled each patient's electric (E-)field using SimNIBS and estimated the connectivity of the E-field using a normative connectome (n = 1000), which was correlated with depression improvement as measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. H1 E-fields improving depression were preferentially connected to a distinct brain circuit, validated with leave-one-out cross-validation (p = 0.0005). This circuit was significantly similar to a predefined causal depression circuit (spatial r = 0.59, p = 0.04) derived from TMS, deep brain stimulation, and lesion studies. E-fields with greater connectivity similarity to this circuit led to greater symptom improvement (r = 0.41, p < 0.001). Post-hoc analyses revealed that more posterior coil positioning increases H1 E-field overlap with the depression circuit, with high overlap at scalp locations 3-6 cm anterior to the motor hotspot. Thus, H1 coil stimulation sites that improve depression converge on a common causal depression circuit. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Data on file
[2]  
Argyelan M, 2024, MOL PSYCHIATR, V29, P229, DOI 10.1038/s41380-023-02318-2
[3]   Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Acute Treatment of Major Depressive Episodes A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis [J].
Brunoni, Andre R. ;
Chaimani, Anna ;
Moffa, Adriano H. ;
Razza, Lais B. ;
Gattaz, Wagner F. ;
Daskalakis, Zafiris J. ;
Carvalho, Andre F. .
JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 74 (02) :143-152
[4]   Psychometric properties of the BASIS-24© (Behaviour and Symptom Identification Scale-revised) Mental Health Outcome Measure [J].
Cameron, I. M. ;
Cunningham, L. ;
Crawford, J. R. ;
Eagles, J. M. ;
Eisen, S. V. ;
Lawton, K. ;
Naji, S. A. ;
Hamilton, R. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 11 (01) :36-43
[5]   Response and Remission Rates Following High-Frequency vs. Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Over Right DLPFC for Treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind Trials [J].
Cao, Xu ;
Deng, Chunshan ;
Su, Xiaolin ;
Guo, Yi .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 9
[6]   Clinical and electrophysiological outcomes of deep TMS over the medial prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices in OCD patients [J].
Carmi, Lior ;
Alyagon, Uri ;
Barnea-Ygael, Noam ;
Zohar, Joseph ;
Dar, Reuven ;
Zangen, Abraham .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (01) :158-165
[7]   Personalized and Circuit-Based Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Evidence, Controversies, and Opportunities [J].
Cash, Robin F. H. ;
Zalesky, Andrew .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 95 (06) :510-522
[8]   Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Cole, Eleanor J. ;
Phillips, Angela L. ;
Bentzley, Brandon S. ;
Stimpson, Katy H. ;
Nejad, Romina ;
Barmak, Fahim ;
Veerapal, Clive ;
Khan, Naushaba ;
Cherian, Kirsten ;
Felber, Emily ;
Brown, Randi ;
Choi, Elizabeth ;
King, Sinead ;
Pankow, Heather ;
Bishop, James H. ;
Azeez, Azeezat ;
Coetzee, John ;
Rapier, Rachel ;
Odenwald, Nicole ;
Carreon, David ;
Hawkins, Jessica ;
Chang, Maureen ;
Keller, Jennifer ;
Raj, Kristin ;
DeBattista, Charles ;
Jo, Booil ;
Espil, Flint M. ;
Schatzberg, Alan F. ;
Sudheimer, Keith D. ;
Williams, Nolan R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 179 (02) :132-141
[9]   Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs [J].
Deng, Zhi-De ;
Lisanby, Sarah H. ;
Peterchev, Angel V. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (01) :1-13
[10]   Targeting repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: do we really know what we are stimulating and how best to do it? [J].
Fitzgerald, Paul B. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (03) :730-736