EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF LMS PLATFORMS IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

被引:0
作者
Secaira, Janeth Mora [1 ,2 ]
Ocampo, Raul Diaz [1 ,2 ]
Miranda, Francisco Rodriguez [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Estatal Quevedo, Quevedo, Ecuador
[2] Univ Huelva, Huelva, Spain
关键词
E-learning; LMS platforms; online platform; assessment; quality; evaluation; university; higher education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study aimed to identify the most relevant articles published between 2018 and the first quarter of 2024 on the quality assessment of LMS platforms at the university level, through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of scientific literature, according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, in the Scopus, WOS, and ERIC databases. To this end, 153 publications were initially analyzed, which, after eliminating duplicate citations, were reduced to 144 and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in a total of 46 contributions, with the purpose of offering an overview of quality assessment in LMS (Learning Management Platforms). The results reflect the coexistence of various dimensions and criteria that help us understand what a true assessment of the quality of LMS platforms at the university level should be. The discussion focuses on identifying and clarifying the dimensions and criteria for evaluating LMS platforms, their current limitations, and the need to propose future lines of research that include the development of assessment instruments at various universities, broaden the geographic context, analyze organizational impact, examine more variables and external factors, and contextualize them for different virtual environments, in order to foster more inclusive and accessible education.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   State of the art on conceptions of quality in higher education [J].
Calamet, F. E. R. N. A. N. D. O. GuSTAvO ACEvEDO ;
BENiTO, FiORELLA G. A. G. O. ;
MuNOz, MARiA A. L. E. J. A. N. D. R. A. D. A. SiLvA ;
OLivERA, A. N. A. LuCiA B. A. S. T. O. S. .
SOPHIA-COLECCION DE FILOSOFIA DE LA EDUCACION, 2021, (32) :119-150
[2]   Digital Platforms in the Emergency Remote Education: the Students' Preferences [J].
Al Shammari, Mishal H. .
ARAB WORLD ENGLISH JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (04) :19-36
[3]  
Ardila J.Y., 2015, Revista Virtual Universidad Catolica del Norte, V45, P84
[4]  
Berrocal E., 2015, Revista Internacional de Aprendizaje y Cibersociedad, V19, P105, DOI [10.37467/gka-revciber.v19.870, DOI 10.37467/GKA-REVCIBER.V19.870]
[5]  
Chacon-Rivas M., 2009, C INT EDUTEC 2009 SO
[6]  
Cordovez S. P., 2023, ConcienciaDigital, V6, P174, DOI [10.33262/concienciadigital.v6i2.2921, DOI 10.33262/CONCIENCIADIGITAL.V6I2.2921]
[7]  
Haryani F., 2021, Tarbawi, V17, P185, DOI [10.32939/tarbawi.v17i2.935, DOI 10.32939/TARBAWI.V17I2.935]
[8]   Addressing the wicked problem of quality in higher education: theoretical approaches and implications [J].
Krause, Kerri-Lee .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 31 (03) :285-297
[9]  
Leon M., 2021, Investigacion y Pensamiento Critico, V9, P46
[10]   Factors determining satisfaction with e-learning during the pandemic in the opinion of Polish and Spanish students: analysis of differences and similarities [J].
Marciniak, Renata ;
Rembielak, Grazyna .
E-MENTOR, 2022, (04) :14-24