Prioritizing Sustainability Innovation in Machinery Manufacturing: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Case Study

被引:0
作者
Hidimoglu, Muzeyyen Burcu [1 ]
Feyzioglu, Ahmet [1 ]
Haliloglu, Huseyin [1 ]
Gok, Akin Emrecan [2 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Inst Pure & Appl Sci, Dept Mech Engn, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Dept Environm Engn, TR-34320 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
sustainability; innovation; machinery manufacturing; multi-criteria decision-making; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); roadmap development; strategic planning; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS;
D O I
10.3390/su17125499
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is a key focus for the machinery manufacturing industry, aiming to align innovation with environmental and economic goals. This research proposes an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based framework to evaluate and rank sustainability-focused innovation criteria. The model was validated using 54,054 projects from CORDIS and T & Uuml;B & Idot;TAK and a survey of 46 experts from academia, industry, and the public sector. According to AHP results, Economic Criteria ranked highest (46%), followed by Product-Related Environmental (18%), Market (16%), Process-Related Environmental (13%), and Social Criteria (7%). Product Cost (45%), Elimination of Hazardous Substances (30%), and Occupational Health and Safety (29%) ranked highest among sub-criteria, reflecting the dominance of financial and regulatory priorities. Social and process-related criteria were less prioritized unless linked to regulatory compliance. The framework provides a practical tool for innovation leaders and policymakers aiming to embed sustainability in strategic planning. It aligns with global initiatives like the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal, contributing to both theory and practice in industrial sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[2]  
BRAUN Virgina., 2013, Successful Qualitative Research a pratical guide for beginners, DOI DOI 10.53841/BPSQMIP.2014.1.18.39
[3]   How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy [J].
Cinelli, Marco ;
Kadzinski, Milosz ;
Gonzalez, Michael ;
Slowinski, Roman .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 96
[4]  
Dillman D. A., 2014, Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
[5]  
Elkington J., 1997, ENVIRON QUAL MANAG, DOI DOI 10.1002/TQEM.3310080106
[6]  
European Commission CORDIS, EU Research Results
[7]   Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Vine-Growing Combining Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Costing and Multicriterial Analysis [J].
Falcone, Giacomo ;
De Luca, Anna Irene ;
Stillitano, Teodora ;
Strano, Alfio ;
Romeo, Giuseppa ;
Gulisano, Giovanni .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (08)
[8]  
Fink A., 2013, How to conduct surveys a step-by-step guide
[9]   Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].
Forman, E ;
Peniwati, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 108 (01) :165-169
[10]  
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), 2021, GRI Standards 2021: Consolidated Set of Standards