Contributing to evidence-based veterinary medicine: A qualitative study of veterinary professionals' views and experiences of client-owned companion animal research

被引:0
作者
Furtado, Tamzin [1 ]
Perkins, Elizabeth [2 ]
Archer, Debra C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Infect Vet & Ecol Sci, Sch Vet Sci, Liverpool, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Populat Hlth, Dept Primary Care & Mental Hlth, Liverpool, England
关键词
HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0322902
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Research on the outcomes of veterinary treatments in dogs, cats and horses has important benefits for these animals and their owners. However, this information is not always available, and the evidence base is often lower-quality than in human medicine. To identify ways to improve the generation of evidence, we investigated the views of veterinary professionals about research involving companion animal patients and their owners. This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with veterinary surgeons and registered veterinary nurses working in UK companion animal clinical practice. Interviews were conducted with 20 veterinary professionals from different clinical settings including both those with and without previous experience of research involving animals. Analyses revealed that veterinary professionals valued evidence-based information to help them make informed decisions about treatment with owners. However, there was often not enough available evidence. Veterinary professionals were willing to help produce this research evidence. However, lack of time and resources were key challenges and in addition, they did not always feel they had the necessary research skills, experience and support. Some participants also found it difficult to discuss participation in research with owners of their veterinary patients. They also had concerns about the amount and type of extra information they would need to give to owners. Veterinary professionals also faced a dilemma as their key role is to protect the welfare of animals that they treat, yet felt that there was the potential for some animals assigned to receive a specific treatment as part of a research study to be disadvantaged. Companion animal research has important benefits for veterinary patients, their owners and for veterinary professionals. Based on our findings, more funding, improved research training, resources, support networks and changes to current regulations are needed. Improved evidence would assist veterinary professionals and owners when making informed decisions around veterinary care.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Animal research, ethical boundary-work, and the geographies of veterinary expertise [J].
Anderson, Alistair ;
Hobson-West, Pru .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2023, 48 (03) :491-505
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Surgeons and Supporting Guidance internet Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons
[3]   Making research everybody's business: a position statement of the Royal College of Physicians and the National Institute of Health and Care Research [J].
Arasaradnam, Ramesh ;
Clarke, Sarah ;
van't Hoff, William ;
Chappell, Lucy .
CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (02) :102-105
[4]   A Declaration of Helsinki for animals [J].
Ashall, Vanessa ;
Morton, David ;
Clutton, Eddie .
VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 50 (04) :309-314
[5]  
Ashall Vanessa, 2018, Food Ethics, V1, P247, DOI [10.1007/s41055-017-0016-2, 10.1007/s41055-017-0016-2]
[6]   The ethical dimension in published animal research in critical care: the public face of science [J].
Bara, Meredith ;
Joffe, Ari R. .
CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (01)
[7]  
Berger PeterThomas Luckmann., 1967, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
[8]  
bestpractice.bmj, 2024, BMJ Best Practice internet BMJ
[9]   Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials [J].
Bhatt, Deepak L. ;
Mehta, Cyrus .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (01) :65-74
[10]  
Bonnett B, 1998, COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, P15