Firm-specific determinants influencing tax avoidance among Indian multinational corporations: a panel regression approach

被引:1
作者
Thayyib, P. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol, VIT Business Sch, Vellore, India
来源
COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE | 2025年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Multinational tax avoidance; corporate tax avoidance; Effective Tax Rates; book-tax differences; tax base avoidance; profit shifting; base erosion; RATES; DEBT; AGGRESSIVENESS; SHELTERS; BENEFITS; EQUITY; IMPACT; BASE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1080/23322039.2025.2483869
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The unethical tax planning practices of Multinational Companies globally remain a significant and unresolved empirical issue in tax and accounting research. Despite growing research on multinational tax avoidance, research on its determinants remains sparse, particularly within the Indian context. Our study aims to fill this gap by (1) identifying firm-specific factors utilized by Indian multinational corporations (MNCs) to minimize corporate tax liabilities, and (2) assessing the impact of the statutory corporate tax cut that took place in 2019 [Income Tax Law Amendment (TLA2019): from similar to 34.94% to similar to 25.17%] on these determinants. I conducted a fixed-effect panel data analysis of firm-specific variables and their impact on corporate tax avoidance of Indian MNCs that were Nifty 500 constituents from 2015 to 2020. The results reveal that research intensity inversely correlates with multinational tax avoidance, which I measure through corporate GAAP Effective Tax Rates (ETR) and significantly widened Book-tax Difference (BTD). Additionally, profitability and firm size exhibited inverse relationships with ETR, signifying the potential influence of MNCs on policymaking. The tax-haven nexus significantly amplified BTD, indicating that MNCs prefer permanent difference-based tax-base avoidance strategies. Surprisingly, leverage and capital intensity did not reduce the ETRs, while leverage positively contributed to BTD expansion, highlighting the prevalent tax base avoidance practices. TLA2019 did not impact tax avoidance in India owing to the optional provisions of 115BAA of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. These findings underscore the need for targeted policy measures to curb tax avoidance, particularly in relationship-driven economies like India, where tax havens like Mauritius, Singapore, and Netherlands, and firm-specific factors play a crucial role in shaping corporate tax liabilities. The findings contribute to the ongoing debate on global tax fairness, highlighting the need for coordinated tax rules that prevent tax base erosion while ensuring that MNCs contribute fairly to domestic revenues of host countries.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 137 条
[21]  
CBDT, 2021, CBDT notifies Rules for implementing the amendments made by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021
[22]   The Political Dynamics of Corporate Tax Avoidance: The Chinese Experience [J].
Chen, Hanwen ;
Tang, Song ;
Wu, Donghui ;
Yang, Daoguang .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 96 (05) :157-180
[23]   Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? [J].
Chen, Shuping ;
Chen, Xia ;
Cheng, Qiang ;
Shevlin, Terry .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 95 (01) :41-61
[24]   Tax avoidance and firm value: evidence from China [J].
Chen, Xudong ;
Hu, Na ;
Wang, Xue ;
Tang, Xiaofei .
NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 5 (01) :25-42
[25]   Offshore activities and corporate tax avoidance [J].
Chen, Zhihong ;
Hope, Ole -Kristian ;
Li, Qingyuan ;
Li, Yongbo .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2024, 85
[26]   Innovation and Corporate Tax Planning: The Distinct Effects of Patents and R&D* [J].
Cheng, C. S. Agnes ;
Guo, Peng ;
Weng, Chia-Hsiang ;
Wu, Qiang .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2021, 38 (01) :621-653
[27]   Top management conservatism and corporate risk strategies: Evidence from managers' personal political orientation and corporate tax avoidance [J].
Christensen, Dane M. ;
Dhaliwal, Dan S. ;
Boivie, Steven ;
Graffin, Scott D. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (12) :1918-1938
[28]  
Christensen J., 2004, Development, V47, P37, DOI [10.1057/palgrave.development.1100066, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.DEVELOPMENT.1100066]
[29]   PROFIT SHIFTING BEFORE AND AFTER THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT [J].
Clausing, Kimberly A. .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2020, 73 (04) :1233-1265
[30]   THE EFFECT OF PROFIT SHIFTING ON THE CORPORATE TAX BASE IN THE UNITED STATES AND BEYOND [J].
Clausing, Kimberly A. .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2016, 69 (04) :905-934