Attitudes towards Artificial intelligence (AI) in psychotherapy: Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy Scale (AIPS)

被引:0
作者
Bilge, Yildiz [1 ]
Emiral, Ekin [1 ]
Delal, Ilayda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci Turkey, Hamidiye Fac Life Sci, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Artificial intelligence; psychotherapy; attitude; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1080/13284207.2025.2515074
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
ObjectiveArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored for its potential applications in psychotherapy; however, whether individuals will adopt these applications and what they expect from them can only be understood by identifying their attitudes towards AI. Therefore, there is a need to develop tools that measure attitudes towards its use. This study aims to create a robust psychometric scale, the Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy Scale (AIPS), to assess these attitudes.MethodThe sample consisted of 723 participants, 372 females and 351 males, aged between 18 and 55 years.ResultsExploratory Factor Analysis identified a three-factor model - risks and limitations, technical advantages, and personal advantages - that explained 52% of the variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the model with acceptable fit indices. The validation of AIPS was assessed through the Young Internet Addiction Scale, the Scale of Attitudes Towards Seeking Psychological Help, and the Basic Personality Traits Inventory. Reliability analysis yielded Cronbach's alpha values of .89, .84, and .72 for the three factors.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that individuals' attitudes towards AI in psychotherapy emphasize perceived benefits and risks. The AIPS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing such attitudes within the Turkish population, providing valuable insights into the integration of AI into psychotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 204
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Nature and operation of attitudes [J].
Ajzen, I .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :27-58
[2]   Attitudes and perspectives towards the preferences for artificial intelligence in psychotherapy [J].
Aktan, Mehmet Emin ;
Turhan, Zeynep ;
Dolu, Ilknur .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2022, 133
[3]  
Albarracn D., 2005, The handbook of attitudes
[4]  
Allport G. W., 1935, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, P798, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412956253
[5]  
Bendig E, 2019, Verhaltenstherapie, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1159/000501812
[6]  
Bhatt S, 2025, ANN NEUROSCI, V32, P117, DOI 10.1177/09727531231221612
[7]  
Cohen R. J., 2013, Psikolojik test ve deerleme (ev.
[8]   Was Eysenck right after all? A reassessment of the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression [J].
Cuijpers, P. ;
Karyotaki, E. ;
Reijnders, M. ;
Ebert, D. D. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2019, 28 (01) :21-30
[9]   Effectiveness of an Empathic Chatbot in Combating Adverse Effects of Social Exclusion on Mood [J].
de Gennaro, Mauro ;
Krumhuber, Eva G. ;
Lucas, Gale .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 10
[10]  
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, 2024, Dijital tuketici trendleri