A Hybrid Approach to Physical and Deep Learning Models for Radar-Based Precipitation Nowcasting

被引:0
作者
Kim, Ho-Jun [1 ]
Yoon, Seong-Sim [2 ]
Gu, Yeong Hyeon [3 ]
Kim, Sung Hoon [4 ]
Choi, Young-Don [4 ]
Kwon, Hyun-Han [1 ]
机构
[1] Sejong Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Civil Engn & Bldg Technol, Dept Land Water & Environm Res, Goyang 10223, South Korea
[3] Sejong Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[4] K water Res Inst, AI Res Lab, Daejeon 34045, South Korea
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2025年 / 63卷
关键词
Rain; Radar; Predictive models; Prediction algorithms; Boosting; Accuracy; Spatiotemporal phenomena; Data models; Radar tracking; Biological system modeling; Blending; boosting algorithm; deep learning (DL); radar nowcasting; semi-Lagrangian; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORK; FLASH FLOODS; PREDICTABILITY; PATTERNS; TRACKING; CLIMATE; MOTION;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2025.3560454
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This study proposes a novel approach to improving radar-based precipitation nowcasting using a boosting algorithm to blend traditional physics-based extrapolation and data-driven deep learning (DL). Here, a semi-Lagrangian approach (PySTEPS) and a data-driven DL model (RainNet) are considered as two representative types of nowcasting models of precipitation. The light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model is adopted as a boosting algorithm due to its efficiency and ability to correct for biases sequentially. The boosting model significantly outperforms both RainNet and PySTEPS with up to 90 min of lead time for critical success index (CSI), probability of detection (POD), false alarm ratio (FAR), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and fractions skill score (FSS) at the 0.1-, 1-, and 5-mm/h thresholds (TSs). The CSI at the 0.1- and 1-mm/h TSs for the boosting model is approximately 10% higher than that of both the RainNet and PySTEPS models. In addition to high CSI, the boosting approach can also achieve superior results in POD and RMSE compared with the RainNet and PySTEPS models across various TSs and lead times. The proposed modeling framework significantly outperforms the individual models in predicting rainfall intensity and spatial distribution, highlighting the potential of blending precipitation nowcasting models.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, An empirical evaluation of deep architectures on problems with many factors of variation, DOI [10.1145/1273496.1273556, 10.1145/1273496, DOI 10.1145/1273496]
[2]   RainNet v1.0: a convolutional neural network for radar-based precipitation nowcasting [J].
Ayzel, Georgy ;
Scheffer, Tobias ;
Heistermann, Maik .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 13 (06) :2631-2644
[3]  
BELLON A, 1978, J APPL METEOROL, V17, P1778, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1978)017<1778:TEOTYO>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   A Streamflow Forecasting Framework using Multiple Climate and Hydrological Models1 [J].
Block, Paul J. ;
Souza Filho, Francisco Assis ;
Sun, Liqiang ;
Kwon, Hyun-Han .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2009, 45 (04) :828-843
[6]  
Bouguet J.-Y, 2001, Intel Corp., V5, P4, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICETET.2009.154
[7]   STEPS: A probabilistic precipitation forecasting scheme which merges an extrapolation nowcast with downscaled NWP [J].
Bowler, Neill E. ;
Pierce, Clive E. ;
Seed, Alan W. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 132 (620) :2127-2155
[8]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[9]   Characteristics of rainstorms over a temperate region derived from multiple time series of weather radar images [J].
De Lannoy, GJM ;
Verhoest, NEC ;
De Troch, FP .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 307 (1-4) :126-144
[10]  
DIXON M, 1993, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V10, P785, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1993)010<0785:TTITAA>2.0.CO