Investigation of Equivalent Reduced Order Models for Flutter Analysis of Various Wing Plate Configurations

被引:0
作者
Ibrahim, Hawraa Safaa [1 ]
Harmin, Mohammad Yazdi [1 ]
Romli, Fairuz Izzuddin [1 ]
Harithuddin, Ahmad Salahuddin Mohd [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Engn, Dept Aerosp Engn, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Baghdad, Coll Engn, Dept Aeronaut Engn, Baghdad, Iraq
来源
JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS AND AVIATION | 2025年 / 57卷 / 03期
关键词
Equivalent Beam Model; Flutter Analysis; Reduced Order Model; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.6125/JoAAA.202503_57(3S).49
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents guidelines for developing an Equivalent Reduced Order Model (EROM) for aeroelastic flutter analysis. The Global Finite Element Model (GFEM) typically involves a denser mesh of elements and nodes, leading to higher computational costs. The EROM is derived from the GFEM based on several prescribed static loading schemes. The study considers three wing plate configurations: untapered-unswept, untaperedsweptback, and tapered-sweptback. The effectiveness of the EROM is assessed in terms of their normal modes and flutter characteristics. The method involves identifying the elastic axis, determining bending and torsional rigidity, and updating the model to match the GFEM's normal mode characteristics. Flutter analysis is then conducted to compare natural frequency and damping trends over a range of airspeeds (V-f and V-zeta). The proposed method effectively lowers the model order, resulting in an approximate 70% reduction in FE structural nodes. The results demonstrate that the developed EROM provides acceptable accuracy, as shown by the low standard deviation in the differences of flutter speed (Delta Vf) and frequency (Delta Ff) between the EROM and GFEM, which are within +/- 0.59 m/s and +/- 0.60 Hz, respectively. Additionally, the V-f and V-zeta plots also indicate comparable trends between EROM and GFEM.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 814
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]   Structural Analysis and Optimization of Wings Subjected to Dynamic Loads [J].
Sarojini, Darshan ;
Mavris, Dimitri .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (02) :1013-1023
[32]  
Sarojini Darshan, 2020, AIAA SCITECH 2020 FO
[33]  
Singh AK, 1988, MSC 1988 WORLD US C, V1
[34]   Slender-Wing Beam Reduction Method for Gradient-Based Aeroelastic Design Optimization [J].
Stodieck, O. ;
Cooper, J. E. ;
Neild, S. A. ;
Lowenberg, M. H. ;
Iorga, L. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2018, 56 (11) :4529-4545
[35]   Interpretation of Bending/Torsion Coupling for Swept, Nonhomogenous Wings [J].
Stodieck, O. ;
Cooper, J. E. ;
Weaver, P. M. .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2016, 53 (04) :892-899
[36]   MODEL-REDUCTION AND CONTROL OF FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES USING KRYLOV VECTORS [J].
SU, TJ ;
CRAIG, RR .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1991, 14 (02) :260-267
[37]  
Tatham R., 1951, AIRCR ENG AEROSP TEC, V23, P209, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB032058
[38]   Development of high fidelity reduced order hybrid stick model for aircraft dynamic aeroelasticity analysis [J].
Thomas, Paul Vazhayil ;
ElSayed, Mostafa S. A. ;
Walch, Denis .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 87 :404-416
[39]   Review of Model Order Reduction Methods and Their Applications in Aeroelasticity Loads Analysis for Design Optimization of Complex Airframes [J].
Thomas, Paul Vazhayil ;
ElSayed, Mostafa S. A. ;
Walch, Denis .
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2019, 32 (02)
[40]   Structural-Optimization Strategy for Composite Wing Based on Equivalent Finite Element Model [J].
Wang, Yu ;
Ouyang, Xing ;
Yin, Hailian ;
Yu, Xiongqing .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2016, 53 (02) :351-359