Investigation of Equivalent Reduced Order Models for Flutter Analysis of Various Wing Plate Configurations

被引:0
作者
Ibrahim, Hawraa Safaa [1 ]
Harmin, Mohammad Yazdi [1 ]
Romli, Fairuz Izzuddin [1 ]
Harithuddin, Ahmad Salahuddin Mohd [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Engn, Dept Aerosp Engn, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Baghdad, Coll Engn, Dept Aeronaut Engn, Baghdad, Iraq
来源
JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS AND AVIATION | 2025年 / 57卷 / 03期
关键词
Equivalent Beam Model; Flutter Analysis; Reduced Order Model; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.6125/JoAAA.202503_57(3S).49
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents guidelines for developing an Equivalent Reduced Order Model (EROM) for aeroelastic flutter analysis. The Global Finite Element Model (GFEM) typically involves a denser mesh of elements and nodes, leading to higher computational costs. The EROM is derived from the GFEM based on several prescribed static loading schemes. The study considers three wing plate configurations: untapered-unswept, untaperedsweptback, and tapered-sweptback. The effectiveness of the EROM is assessed in terms of their normal modes and flutter characteristics. The method involves identifying the elastic axis, determining bending and torsional rigidity, and updating the model to match the GFEM's normal mode characteristics. Flutter analysis is then conducted to compare natural frequency and damping trends over a range of airspeeds (V-f and V-zeta). The proposed method effectively lowers the model order, resulting in an approximate 70% reduction in FE structural nodes. The results demonstrate that the developed EROM provides acceptable accuracy, as shown by the low standard deviation in the differences of flutter speed (Delta Vf) and frequency (Delta Ff) between the EROM and GFEM, which are within +/- 0.59 m/s and +/- 0.60 Hz, respectively. Additionally, the V-f and V-zeta plots also indicate comparable trends between EROM and GFEM.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 814
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abdo M, 2003, CAN AER SPAC I 50 AG
[2]   On the Fine-Tuning of the Stick-Beam Wing Dynamic Model of a Tiltrotor: A Case Study [J].
Beretta, Jacopo ;
Cardozo, Andres ;
Paletta, Nicola ;
Chiariello, Antonio ;
Belardo, Marika .
AEROSPACE, 2024, 11 (02)
[3]   Multilevel Structural Optimization for Preliminary Wing-Box Weight Estimation [J].
Bindolino, G. ;
Ghiringhelli, G. ;
Ricci, S. ;
Terraneo, M. .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2010, 47 (02) :475-489
[4]  
Buchschmid M, 2012, ECCOMAS C 2016 P 7 E, V2, P4221, DOI [10.7712/100016.2106.9280, DOI 10.7712/100016.2106.9280]
[5]   VABS: A new concept for composite rotor blade cross-sectional modeling [J].
Cesnik, CES ;
Hodges, DH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER SOCIETY, 1997, 42 (01) :27-38
[6]  
Chan N, 2018, International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), V7, P155, DOI [10.14419/ijet.v7i4.13.21349, DOI 10.14419/IJET.V7I4.13.21349]
[7]   Aeroelastic tailoring via ribs orientation of NASA Common Research Model [J].
Chan, Y. N. ;
Harmin, M. Y. ;
Rafie, A. S. M. .
AEROS CONFERENCE 2017, 2017, 270
[8]  
Chan YN, 2021, Thesis
[9]   COUPLING OF SUBSTRUCTURES FOR DYNAMIC ANALYSES [J].
CRAIG, RR ;
BAMPTON, MCC .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1968, 6 (07) :1313-&
[10]   Accurate Stick Model Development for Static Analysis of Complex Aircraft Wing-Box Structures [J].
Elsayed, Mostafa S. A. ;
Sedaghati, Ramin ;
Abdo, Mohammed .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2009, 47 (09) :2063-2075