Checking the facts! exploring social media users' sharing of verified COVID-19 information from the comprehensive action determination model

被引:0
作者
Tang, Zhenya [1 ]
Soltwisch, Brandon [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Northern Colorado, Monfort Coll Business, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
Social media crisis management; Verified information sharing; Online prosocial behavior; Comprehensive action determination model; Misinformation; ENERGY-SAVING BEHAVIOR; SELF-EFFICACY; FEAR APPEALS; INTENTION; TECHNOLOGY; ACCEPTANCE; HABIT; NORM; MOTIVATIONS; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2025.104161
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Sharing verified information on social media is critical to preventing the spread of dangerous misinformation, protecting public health, and promoting informed decision-making during health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to shift the focus from the detrimental impact of social media users in disseminating unverified information during crises to the potential for motivating these same users to counteract the COVID-19 infodemic by sharing verified information. Our research model is grounded in the comprehensive action determination model and tested through survey data from 395 social media users. Our findings suggest that users' verified-information-sharing behavior is influenced by various factors, including attitude, personal norms, social norms, habit, self-efficacy, and perceived threat. Our study highlights the role of social media users in combating the spread of unverified information during health crises and offers significant theoretical and practical implications.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Anderson CL, 2010, MIS QUART, V34, P613
[2]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[3]   Understanding age-related differences in online prosocial behavior: A qualitative thematic analysis of interpersonal, ideological, and mixed patterns [J].
Au, Algae Kit Yee ;
Cheng, Sophie Kai Lam ;
Wu, Wesley Chi Hang ;
Shum, David H. K. ;
Nezlek, John B. ;
Hui, Bryant Pui Hung .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 2025, 17
[4]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[5]   How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research [J].
Benitez, Jose ;
Henseler, Jorg ;
Castillo, Ana ;
Schuberth, Florian .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 57 (02)
[6]   WHAT DO SYSTEMS USERS HAVE TO FEAR? USING FEAR APPEALS TO ENGENDER THREATS AND FEAR THAT MOTIVATE PROTECTIVE SECURITY BEHAVIORS [J].
Boss, Scott R. ;
Galletta, Dennis F. ;
Lowry, Paul Benjamin ;
Moody, Gregory D. ;
Polak, Peter .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2015, 39 (04) :837-U461
[7]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[8]   Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19 [J].
Budd, Jobie ;
Miller, Benjamin S. ;
Manning, Erin M. ;
Lampos, Vasileios ;
Zhuang, Mengdie ;
Edelstein, Michael ;
Rees, Geraint ;
Emery, Vincent C. ;
Stevens, Molly M. ;
Keegan, Neil ;
Short, Michael J. ;
Pillay, Deenan ;
Manley, Ed ;
Cox, Ingemar J. ;
Heymann, David ;
Johnson, Anne M. ;
McKendry, Rachel A. .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2020, 26 (08) :1183-1192
[9]  
Burton-Jones A., 2021, MIS Quarterly, V45, piii
[10]   Between the technology acceptance model and sustainable energy technology acceptance model: Investigating smart meter acceptance in the United States [J].
Chen, Chien-fei ;
Xu, Xiaojing ;
Arpan, Laura .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 25 :93-104