Prediction of flexural crack width of reinforced concrete beams using interpretable machine learning algorithms

被引:1
作者
Agarwal, Harsha [1 ]
Shariff, Mohammad Najeeb [2 ]
Mangalathu, Sujith
机构
[1] Indian Inst Engn Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Howrah 711103, W Bengal, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Crack width; Machine learning; Regression; Reinforced concrete; Flexure; SHEAR-STRENGTH; DESIGN; COVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141628
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Accurate crack prediction is crucial for structural systems' serviceability limit state design, yet it remains a challenging task. This study explores the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the flexural crack width in reinforced concrete (RC) beams with an extensive data set of 675 experimental samples. Each training sample consists of five predictive features: strength of concrete (fck), stress in steel (fs), diameter of the bar(dbt), ratio of reinforcement (p ), cover depth (c ), and the corresponding target feature (maximum crack width) uwcr. Analysis and comparison of six different ML models reveal that the Extra Gradient Boosting Regressor, with a mean error of 18 percent, was the best performer among the ML algorithms considered in this study to predict the crack width. Additionally, SHapley Additive explanations have been used to explain the trends observed in the ML models and the identification of significant parameters. It is noted that the crack width is significantly influenced by the stress in reinforcing steel. To assess the predictions using the standard international codes of practice, five codes have been considered: fib MC 2010, Eurocode (EC) 2, Proposed EC2, ACI, and IS 3370. It is seen that the EC2, proposed EC2, ACI code and fib MC 2010 are able to predict the crack width with reasonable accuracy, having a mean error of 53 percent, and the proposed ML Models can enhance the crack width prediction in RC beams.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ACI, 2007, Committee.224, ACI.224.1R-07 Causes, Evaluation, and Repair of Cracks in Concrete Structures
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, IS3370, Concrete Structures for Retaining Aqueous Liquids-Code of Practice, Part 2 Plain and Reinforced Concrete
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CEN/TC250/SC2.PT.SC2.T1.S
[4]  
BALAZS GL, 1993, ACI MATER J, V90, P340
[5]   Design for SLS according to fib Model Code 2010 [J].
Balazs, Gyoergy L. ;
Bisch, Philippe ;
Borosnyoi, Adorjan ;
Burdet, Olivier ;
Burns, Clare ;
Ceroni, Francesca ;
Cervenka, Vladimir ;
Chiorino, Mario A. ;
Debernardi, Piergiorgio ;
Eckfeldt, Lars ;
El-Badry, Mamdouh ;
Fehling, Ekkehard ;
Foster, Stephen J. ;
Ghali, Amin ;
Gribniak, Viktor ;
Guiglia, Matteo ;
Kaklauskas, Gintaris ;
Lark, Robert J. ;
Lenkei, Peter ;
Lorrain, Michel ;
Mari, Antonio ;
Ozbolt, Josko ;
Pecce, Marisa ;
Perez Caldentey, Alejandro ;
Taliano, Maurizio ;
Tkalcic, Damir ;
Torrenti, Jean Michel ;
Torres, Lluis ;
Toutlemonde, Francois ;
Ueda, Tamon ;
Vitek, Jan L. ;
Vrablik, Lukas .
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2013, 14 (02) :99-123
[6]   A review of literature and code requirements for the crack width limitations for design of concrete structures in serviceability limit states [J].
Basteskar, Mikael ;
Engen, Morten ;
Kanstad, Terje ;
Fossa, Kjell T. .
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2019, 20 (02) :678-688
[7]  
Borosnyoi A., 2005, Structural Concrete, V6, P53, DOI 10.1680/stco.6.2.53.66711
[8]  
Broms B.B., 1965, Crack width and crack spacing in reinforced concrete members, V62, P1237
[9]   Machine Learning for Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams [J].
Castillo, Rodrigo ;
Okumus, Pinar ;
Khorasani, Negar Elhami ;
Chandola, Varun .
ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2022, 119 (05) :83-94
[10]  
CEB-FIP, 2012, bulletin, V6