Comparative analysis of hydrogen production methods: Environmental impact and efficiency of electrochemical and thermochemical processes

被引:5
作者
Zuo, Xiaoqiong [1 ]
Toam, Quoc [2 ]
Zhong, Yifan [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Donghu Coll, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Wuhan 430212, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Electrochemical; Hydrogen technologies; Electrolysis; Alkaline water electrolysis; Thermochemical; ENERGY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.171
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The generation of hydrogen is a vital part of the world's shift to sustainable energy. However, the efficiency and environmental trade-offs between various production techniques are poorly understood. The ecological effects, efficiency, and technological innovation trends of thermochemical biomass conversion, alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), and electrochemical hydrogen production are compared in this paper. This study evaluates global market positions and innovation patterns in these technologies over the last 20 years using patent data from major economies, such as the US, China, Japan, and Germany. A bibliometric technique using data from the European Patent Office was used to measure patenting activity and provide insights into the dynamics of research and development (R&D). The results show that whereas China, Japan, and the United States dominate innovation across several hydrogen production sectors, Germany lags in bioenergy patenting despite significant breakthroughs in hydrogen and battery technologies. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating sustainability metrics beyond patent analysis to influence industry investments and policy. To promote the development of cleaner hydrogen production pathways-crucial for a sustainable energy future-this study suggests specific innovation incentives, especially in bioenergy technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 440
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Empowering the hydrogen economy: The transformative potential of blockchain technology [J].
Abdin, Zainul .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 200
[2]   Metal-organic frameworks for electrocatalytic water-splitting: Beyond the pyrolysis [J].
Ahmad, Farooq ;
Rafiq, Khezina ;
Najam, Tayyaba ;
Hussain, Ejaz ;
Sohail, Manzar ;
Abid, Muhammad Zeeshan ;
Mahmood, Azhar ;
Javed, Muhammad Sufyan ;
Shah, Syed Shoaib Ahmad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (90) :35075-35111
[3]   Simultaneous electrochemical determination of hydrazine and hydroxylamine on a thiadiazole derivative modified pencil graphite electrode [J].
Antherjanam, Santhy ;
Saraswathyamma, Beena .
MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2022, 275
[4]   Techno-economics and life-cycle assessment of biological and thermochemical treatment of bio-waste [J].
Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar ;
Sarsaiya, Surendra ;
Wainaina, Steven ;
Rajendran, Karthik ;
Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar ;
Liu, Tao ;
Duan, Yumin ;
Jain, Archana ;
Sindhu, Raveendran ;
Binod, Parameswaran ;
Pandey, Ashok ;
Zhang, Zengqiang ;
Taherzadeh, Mohammad J. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 144
[5]   Digitalization of Battery Manufacturing: Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities [J].
Ayerbe, Elixabete ;
Berecibar, Maitane ;
Clark, Simon ;
Franco, Alejandro A. ;
Ruhland, Janna .
ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS, 2022, 12 (17)
[6]   A hybrid energy storage system using compressed air and hydrogen as the energy carrier [J].
Bartela, Lukasz .
ENERGY, 2020, 196
[7]  
Bin Noor W., 2024, Futur. Energy, P1
[8]   Support for nuclear power and proenvironmental attitudes: The cases of Germany and Poland [J].
Bohdanowicz, Zbigniew ;
Lopaciuk-Gonczaryk, Beata ;
Gajda, Pawel ;
Rajewski, Adam .
ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 177
[9]   Systemic risk among Chinese oil and petrochemical firms based on dynamic tail risk spillover networks [J].
Chen, Tingqiang ;
Zheng, Xin ;
Wang, Lei .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2025, 77
[10]  
Chen Z., 2024, IEEE Trans Ind Electron