Numerical Simulation Study on Different Exhaust Air Transfer Conditions and Safety of Pulverized Coal System

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Yunqin [1 ]
Sun, Guowei [2 ]
Guo, Weiwei [2 ]
Zhao, Lingling [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Energy & Environm, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[2] Guoneng Shenwan Maanshan Power Generat Co Ltd, Maanshan 243051, Peoples R China
关键词
pulverizing system; numerical simulation; exhaust air transfer; operational adjustment; CO concentration; IGNITION; GAS;
D O I
10.3390/en18102408
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Enhancing the safety of pulverizing systems is crucial for ensuring safe operation in the power industry. In this study, the exhaust air transfer system of a 330 MW power unit was investigated through numerical simulations. The internal flow field, the temperature distribution, and the CO concentration in the primary airbox under five exhaust air transfer conditions were analyzed. Furthermore, the effects of varying hot air velocity and temperature on the low-velocity region and combustible gas accumulation were examined to determine optimal safety conditions. The results indicate that, among the five conditions, the 100% B exhaust air transfer leads to the largest low-velocity region, the highest average CO mass fraction, and the greatest deflagration risk, whereas the 75% A exhaust air transfer condition ensures higher safety. Increasing the hot air velocity from 1 m/s to 10 m/s improves flow characteristics and reduces volatile matter accumulation, with lower velocities associated with higher CO concentrations. In contrast, raising the hot air temperature from 560 K to 610 K has a smaller effect on the flow characteristics, although higher temperatures correspond to slightly increased CO levels. In practical operation, maintaining an A/B exhaust air ratio of 75%A/25%B or keeping the hot air velocity above 5 m/s and the hot air temperature below 580 K is most beneficial for the safe operation of the pulverizing system.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   3-DIMENSIONAL DISCRETE-ORDINATES MODELING OF RADIATIVE-TRANSFER IN A GEOMETRICALLY COMPLEX FURNACE [J].
ADAMS, BR ;
SMITH, PJ .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 88 (5-6) :293-308
[2]   The flame deflagration of hybrid methane coal dusts in a large-scale detonation tube (LSDT) [J].
Ajrash, Mohammed J. ;
Zanganeh, Jafar ;
Moghtaderi, Behdad .
FUEL, 2017, 194 :491-502
[3]  
Ansys Inc, 2024, Ansys Fluent Theory Guide, Release 2024 R1, P475
[4]  
[曹嘉乐 Cao Jiale], 2024, [热能动力工程, Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power], V39, P95
[5]   Experimental and numerical study on flame propagation behaviors in coal dust explosions [J].
Cao, Weiguo ;
Gao, Wei ;
Peng, Yuhuai ;
Liang, Jiyuan ;
Pan, Feng ;
Xu, Sen .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 266 :456-462
[6]   Comparison of underground mine DPM simulation using discrete phase and continuous phase models [J].
Chang, Ping ;
Xu, Guang ;
Zhou, Fubao ;
Mullins, Benjamin ;
Abishek, S. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 127 :45-55
[7]  
Cheng X., 2020, Clean Coal Technol, V26, P43
[8]  
[成志红 Cheng Zhihong], 2017, [热能动力工程, Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power], V32, P109
[9]   Comparative study using renormalized group k-ε, realizable k-ε, and standard k-ε models for flow through S-shaped diffuser [J].
Das, Asim Kumar ;
Singh, Ravi Kant ;
Gupta, Nakul ;
Kumar, Amit ;
Dwivedi, Yagya Dutta ;
Rana, Subhas Chandra ;
Roy, Manideep ;
Singh, Pooja ;
Ansu, Alok Kumar ;
Goyal, Ashish ;
Gupta, Manish .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM, 2024, 18 (05) :3397-3411
[10]  
Duan Y., 2017, Clean Coal Technol, V23, P36