Does environmental regulations boost corporate sustainability? A perspective of environmental strategy

被引:0
作者
Xin, Zihao [1 ]
Liu, Chang [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Fac Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Dalian, Peoples R China
关键词
Central environmental protection inspector; Environmental strategy; Corporate sustainability; Media reports; Top management teams characteristics; MANAGERIAL PERCEPTIONS; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS; INDUSTRY; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125625
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concerning the impact of the Central Environmental Protection Inspector (CEPI), existing studies have mainly focused on the level of environmental protection. However, from the perspective of environmental strategy, firms may respond to regulations with a variety of business behaviors, which can influence corporate sustainability (CS). Therefore, we draw on data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2020 and apply a time-varying difference-in-differences method to examine the effect of CEPI on CS. Our findings demonstrate that CEPI has a positive effect on CS, which remains significant even after employing a series of robust measures. We further find that firms are more inclined to adopt proactive environmental strategies to address environmental pressures than reactive environmental strategies. Moreover, media reports and the top management teams characteristics have heterogeneous effects. Finally, the expanded analysis found that CEPI can improve the financial consequences of firms. Our study contributes to the elucidation of the nexus between environmental policies and corporate sustainability, thus offering valuable insights for the development of ecological accountability measures.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   How to Define an Environmental Policy to Improve Corporate Sustainability in Developing Countries [J].
Sade Abreu, Monica Cavalcanti .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 18 (08) :542-556
[32]   Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy [J].
Sharma, S .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :681-697
[33]  
Sharma S, 1998, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V19, P729, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.3.CO
[34]  
2-W
[35]   Integrated pollution prevention and control -: the Finnish approach [J].
Silvo, K ;
Melanen, M ;
Honkasalo, A ;
Ruonala, S ;
Lindström, M .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2002, 35 (1-2) :45-60
[36]   Mandatory Targets and Environmental Performance: An Analysis Based on Regression Discontinuity Design [J].
Tang, Xiao ;
Liu, Zhengwen ;
Yi, Hongtao .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (09)
[37]   Corporate sustainability and trade credit financing: Evidence from environmental, social, and governance ratings [J].
Tian, Haowen ;
Tian, Gaoliang .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (05) :1896-1908
[38]   Does environmental inspection led by central government undermine Chinese heavy-polluting firms' stock value? The buffer role of political connection [J].
Tian, Meng ;
Xu, Guohu ;
Zhang, Linzi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 236
[39]   The impact of campaign-style enforcement on corporate environmental Action : Evidence from China's central environmental protection inspection [J].
Wang, Hongru ;
Fan, Chengming ;
Chen, Sicheng .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 290
[40]   Does central environmental protection inspection improve corporate environmental, social, and governance performance? Evidence from China [J].
Wang, Lin ;
Le, Quanquan ;
Peng, Manru ;
Zeng, Huixiang ;
Kong, Lingyao .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (06) :2962-2984