Does environmental regulations boost corporate sustainability? A perspective of environmental strategy

被引:0
作者
Xin, Zihao [1 ]
Liu, Chang [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Fac Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Dalian, Peoples R China
关键词
Central environmental protection inspector; Environmental strategy; Corporate sustainability; Media reports; Top management teams characteristics; MANAGERIAL PERCEPTIONS; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS; INDUSTRY; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125625
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concerning the impact of the Central Environmental Protection Inspector (CEPI), existing studies have mainly focused on the level of environmental protection. However, from the perspective of environmental strategy, firms may respond to regulations with a variety of business behaviors, which can influence corporate sustainability (CS). Therefore, we draw on data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2020 and apply a time-varying difference-in-differences method to examine the effect of CEPI on CS. Our findings demonstrate that CEPI has a positive effect on CS, which remains significant even after employing a series of robust measures. We further find that firms are more inclined to adopt proactive environmental strategies to address environmental pressures than reactive environmental strategies. Moreover, media reports and the top management teams characteristics have heterogeneous effects. Finally, the expanded analysis found that CEPI can improve the financial consequences of firms. Our study contributes to the elucidation of the nexus between environmental policies and corporate sustainability, thus offering valuable insights for the development of ecological accountability measures.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF MANDATORY AND VOLUNTARY REGULATORY PRESSURES ON FIRMS' ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH [J].
Alberto Aragon-Correa, J. ;
Marcus, Alfred A. ;
Vogel, David .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2020, 14 (01) :339-365
[2]  
Aragón-Correa JA, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P71
[3]   Corporate environmentalism - The construct and its measurement [J].
Banerjee, SB .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2002, 55 (03) :177-191
[4]   Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations [J].
Banerjee, SB .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2001, 38 (04) :489-513
[5]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736
[6]   Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective [J].
Buysse, K ;
Verbeke, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (05) :453-470
[7]   The role of corporate governance in environmental policy disclosure and sustainable development [J].
Campanella, Francesco ;
Serino, Luana ;
Crisci, Anna ;
D'Ambra, Antonello .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (01) :474-484
[8]   Environmental stakeholder management as business strategy: the case of the corporate wildlife habitat enhancement programme [J].
Cardskadden, H ;
Lober, DJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, 52 (02) :183-202
[9]   The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective [J].
Delmas, MA .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2002, 35 (01) :91-119
[10]   The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review [J].
Drempetic, Samuel ;
Klein, Christian ;
Zwergel, Bernhard .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 167 (02) :333-360