Scarf Adhesive Bonding of 3D-Printed Polymer Structures

被引:0
作者
Ribeiro, Tiago F. R. [1 ]
Campilho, Raul D. S. G. [1 ,2 ]
Pinto, Ricardo F. R. [3 ]
Rocha, Ricardo J. B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Porto, Ctr Res & Dev Mech Engn, ISEP Sch Engn, R Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida 431, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[2] INEGI Polo FEUP, Rua Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[3] Inst Politecn Viana Castelo, proMetheus, P-4900347 Viana Do Castelo, Portugal
来源
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING AND MATERIALS PROCESSING | 2025年 / 9卷 / 04期
关键词
additive manufacturing; adhesive joints; strength prediction; cohesive zone models;
D O I
10.3390/jmmp9040115
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) has swiftly emerged as a substitute for conventional methods such as machining and injection moulding. Its appeal is attributed to accelerated prototyping, improved sustainability, and the capacity to fabricate intricate shapes. Nonetheless, the size constraints of additive manufacturing components require the assembly of smaller 3D-printed elements to create larger structures. This study investigates the tensile properties of scarf joints (SJs) created from several polymers, including ABS, PETG, and PLA, adhered with Araldite (R) 2015 and Sikaforce (R) 7752 adhesives. The characteristics of the adherends were assessed prior to examining the adhesive efficacy in the SJ configuration. Experimental evaluations quantified failure modes, joint strength, assembly stiffness, and energy at failure, comparing findings with predictions from a cohesive zone model (CZM). The objective was to determine the ideal combination of materials and adhesives for enhanced joint performance. Results indicated that joint performance is greatly affected by the adherend material, adhesive selection, and scarf angle. PLA and Araldite (R) 2015 typically exhibited optimal strength and stiffness, but Sikaforce (R) 7752 demonstrated enhanced energy absorption for extended bonding lengths.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Adams R.D., 2005, Adhesive bonding Science, technology and applications
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, STANDARD TEST METHOD, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Stainless, Heat-Resisting, Maraging, and Other Similar Chromium-Nickel-Iron Alloys, DOI DOI 10.1520/D0638-14
[4]   Additive manufacturing technology: the status, applications, and prospects [J].
Bahnini, Insaf ;
Rivette, Mickael ;
Rechia, Ahmed ;
Siadat, Ali ;
Elmesbahi, Abdelilah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 97 (1-4) :147-161
[5]   Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review [J].
Bikas, H. ;
Stavropoulos, P. ;
Chryssolouris, G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 83 (1-4) :389-405
[6]   Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer [J].
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
Banea, M. D. ;
Neto, J. A. B. P. ;
da Silva, L. F. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2013, 44 :48-56
[7]  
Cavalcanti D.K. K., 2019, Annals of "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati. Fascicle XII, V30, P27, DOI DOI 10.35219/AWET.2019.04
[8]   A physical investigation of dimensional and mechanical characteristics of 3D printed nut and bolt for industrial applications [J].
Chand, Ramesh ;
Sharma, Vishal S. ;
Trehan, Rajeev ;
Gupta, Munish Kumar .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (05) :953-966
[9]   Resource-efficient joint fabrication by welding metal 3D-printed parts to conventional steel: A structural integrity study [J].
Chierici, Martina ;
Berto, Filippo ;
Kanyilmaz, Alper .
FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2021, 44 (05) :1271-1291
[10]   Strength and Fracture Characterization of a Novel Polyurethane Adhesive for the Automotive Industry [J].
Faneco, T. M. S. ;
Campilho, R. D. S. G. ;
Silva, F. J. G. ;
Lopes, R. M. .
JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2017, 45 (02) :398-407