Optimising zinc sacrificial anode configurations for corrosion protection in patch-repaired reinforced concrete Slabs: Experimental insights and underlying electrochemical mechanisms

被引:1
作者
Bui, Huy Tang [1 ,3 ]
Tan, Kang Hai [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, 50 Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, 50 Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[3] Hanoi Univ Civil Engn, Dept Bridge & Tunnel Engn, 55 Giai Phong St, Hanoi, Vietnam
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Patch repair; Zinc sacrificial anode; Zinc configuration; Electrochemical mechanism; CATHODIC PROTECTION; MACROCELL CORROSION; STEEL; MODEL; BEHAVIOR; CRACKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112915
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Patching is one of the most commonly used methods to repair spalled concrete caused by steel bar corrosion. However, cracks frequently reappear in the surrounding patched areas within a few months due to macrocell corrosion. To mitigate this issue, sacrificial anode cathodic protection (SACP) has emerged as a promising technique. This study presents an experimental investigation into the corrosion kinetics of reinforced concrete (RC) slabs subjected to four different repair configurations: (1) patch repair without sacrificial anodes; (2) patch repair with a single large zinc anode placed at the centre of the repair area; (3) patch repair with multiple zinc anodes, having the same total surface area as in (2), distributed along the repair boundary within the patch mortar; and (4) patch repair with the same zinc anodes as in (3) but positioned outside the patch mortar. The results indicate that the most effective macrocell corrosion protection was achieved when the zinc anode was divided into multiple smaller pieces and embedded in the concrete substrate along the repair boundary. In contrast, embedding zinc anodes within the patch mortar, as in configuration (3), led to a reduction in protection efficacy, while configuration (2) exhibited the lowest effectiveness. Notably, the patch repair specimen without zinc anodes experienced the most severe macrocell corrosion. However, zinc anode cathodic protection, regardless of the configuration, did not significantly influence microcell corrosion in the repaired RC slabs. To further elucidate the experimental findings, an electrochemical mechanism was proposed, considering the anodic and cathodic polarisation kinetics of both corroded and uncorroded steel bars, as well as the behaviour of zinc sacrificial anodes.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Optimizing the electrode position in sacrificial anode cathodic protection systems using boundary element method [J].
Abootalebi, O. ;
Kermanpur, A. ;
Shishesaz, M. R. ;
Golozar, M. A. .
CORROSION SCIENCE, 2010, 52 (03) :678-687
[2]   An experimental study of electrochemical incompatibility between repaired patch concrete and existing old concrete [J].
Ali, M. Shafqat ;
Leyne, Eileen ;
Saifuzzaman, Mohammad ;
Mirza, M. Saeed .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 174 :159-172
[3]   Critical chloride content in reinforced concrete - A review [J].
Angst, Ueli ;
Elsener, Bernhard ;
Larsen, Claus K. ;
Vennesland, Oystein .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2009, 39 (12) :1122-1138
[4]   Beyond the chloride threshold concept for predicting corrosion of steel in concrete [J].
Angst, Ueli M. ;
Isgor, O. Burkan ;
Hansson, Carolyn M. ;
Sagues, Alberto ;
Geiker, Mette Rika .
APPLIED PHYSICS REVIEWS, 2022, 9 (01)
[5]   Challenges and opportunities in corrosion of steel in concrete [J].
Angst, Ueli M. .
MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 51 (01)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, A. C876-15
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Standard Guide for Development and Use of a Galvanic Series for Predicting Galvanic Corrosion Performance
[8]  
ASTMG71, 2009, Standard Guide for Conducting and Evaluating Galvanic Corrosion Tests in Electrolytes
[9]  
Barkey DP, 2004, ACI MATER J, V101, P266
[10]   Corrosion propagation in cracked reinforced concrete, toward determining residual service life [J].
Bezuidenhout, Schalk R. ;
van Zijl, Gideon P. A. G. .
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2019, 20 (06) :2183-2193