Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and rectal cancer: An umbrella review

被引:0
作者
Villanova, Valentina [1 ]
Martinino, Alessandro [2 ]
Stanzani, Emilia [3 ]
Pastena, Paola [4 ]
Lorenzon, Laura [5 ]
Giovinazzo, Francesco [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Sch Med, Naples, Italy
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Surg, Durham, NC USA
[3] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Sch Med, Rome, Italy
[4] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Cardiol, New York, NY USA
[5] Catholic Univ Sacred Hearth, Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[6] UniCamillus St Camillus Int Univ Hlth Sci, Rome, Italy
[7] St Camillus Hosp, Dept Surg, Treviso, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD | 2025年 / 60卷
关键词
Extended lymphadenectomy; Local recurrence; Rectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; RESECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102215
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (EPLND) for rectal cancer is common in Asian countries to reduce local recurrence and improve survival. This umbrella review investigates the benefit of adding extended lymphadenectomy to the standard total mesorectal excision (TME) practice. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the role of EPLND in rectal cancer surgery. Primary outcomes were local recurrence and overall survival; secondary outcomes included: operation time, blood loss, urinary dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction. Of the 953 articles screened, 12 met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up time was 52 months. In terms of overall survival, 10 studies found no statistically significant difference in the EPLND group; only two showed a significant improvement in 5-year survival. Nine studies found no significant benefit of EPLND in preventing local recurrence, while two suggested benefits for patients with locally advanced cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In most studies, operation time and blood loss were higher in the EPLND group. EPLND was associated with increased odds of urinary and sexual dysfunction, with four out of six studies reporting higher rates for both outcomes. Our analysis concludes that EPLND offers no additional benefit over TME alone in terms of local recurrence, overall survival, or secondary outcomes, including increased risks of urinary and sexual dysfunction, longer operation times, and greater blood loss.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Radical Correction Combined With Extensive Lymphadenectomy and Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Preservation for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer
    Liu, Tao
    Zhang, Chao
    Yu, PeiWu
    Chen, Jun
    Zeng, Dongzhu
    Gan, Lu
    Lv, Wei
    Liu, LiYe
    Yan, Xiaochu
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2011, 10 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [32] A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer
    Simillis, Constantinos
    Baird, Daniel L. H.
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Pawa, Nikhil
    Brown, Gina
    Rasheed, Shahnawaz
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (02) : 291 - 299
  • [33] Extended lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer
    Dorin, Ryan P.
    Skinner, Eila C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (05) : 414 - 420
  • [34] Rise and fall of total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 11,366 patients
    Gabriele Anania
    Richard Justin Davies
    Alberto Arezzo
    Francesco Bagolini
    Vito D’Andrea
    Luigina Graziosi
    Salomone Di Saverio
    Georgi Popivanov
    Isaac Cheruiyot
    Roberto Cirocchi
    Annibale Donini
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 2321 - 2333
  • [35] The feasibility of laparoscopic extended pelvic surgery for rectal cancer
    Hayato Nakamura
    Keisuke Uehara
    Atsuki Arimoto
    Takehiro Kato
    Tomoki Ebata
    Masato Nagino
    Surgery Today, 2016, 46 : 950 - 956
  • [36] Oncological outcome after lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for low rectal carcinoma: not only an N-status matter
    Peparini, Nadia
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (1-2) : 54 - 58
  • [37] Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and various radical prostatectomy techniques: is pelvic drainage necessary?
    Danuser, Hansjoerg
    Di Pierro, Giovanni Battista
    Stucki, Patrick
    Mattei, Agostino
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (06) : 963 - 969
  • [38] Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer: Technique and initial outcomes
    Finelli, A
    Gill, IS
    Desai, MM
    Moinzadeh, A
    Magi-Galluzzi, C
    Kaouk, JH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (05) : 1809 - 1812
  • [39] Evaluation of Lateral Pelvic Nodes in Patients With Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Kim, Dae Jung
    Chung, Jae-Joon
    Yu, Jeong-Sik
    Cho, Eun Suk
    Kim, Joo Hee
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (06) : 1245 - 1255
  • [40] Predictive Factors of Pelvic Recurrence After Treatment for Rectal Cancer
    Lu, Tzung-Ju
    Chen, Chuang-Wei
    Hsiao, Koung-Hung
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 85 (02) : 274 - 279