Comparative analysis of five diagnostic tools in detecting mild cognitive impairment in older adults

被引:0
作者
Ferasat, Mahdis [1 ]
Ghoochani, Bahareh Zeynalzadeh [2 ]
Kaveh, Mohammad Hossein [3 ]
Caycho-Rodriguez, Tomas [4 ]
Asadollahi, Abdolrahim [5 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Hlth, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Rehabil Sci, Dept Occupat Therapy, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Univ Cient, Fac Psicol, Lima, Peru
[5] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth, Dept Gerontol, 3rd Floor,Razi Ave, Shiraz 7153675541, Iran
来源
MIDDLE EAST CURRENT PSYCHIATRY-MECPSYCH | 2025年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
Accuracy; Cognitive impairment; Cross-sectional study; Iran; Mild cognitive impairment; Montreal cognitive assessment; Older adults; Psychometric study; Socioeconomic status; Wechsler memory scale; Wisconsin card sorting test; Women; Aged; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Cognitive dysfunction; Diagnostic accuracy; Educational status; Executive function; Geriatric assessment; Longitudinal studies; Memory disorders; Mental status; Dementia tests; Neuropsychological tests; Psychometrics; Quality of life; Socioeconomic factors;
D O I
10.1186/s43045-025-00534-w
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Mild Cognitive Impairment is a critical condition in older adults requiring accurate diagnostic tools for early detection. This study evaluates diagnostic accuracy of five cognitive assessment tools for detecting MCI among older women. Methods A cross-sectional psychometric study was conducted with 293 women aged >= 60 from Women Day Care Centers in Iran. Participants were assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment at two time points, the London Tower Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition. Statistical analyses included binomial proportion tests, Bayesian analysis, chi-square tests, and Bland-Altman analysis to assess diagnostic performance, agreement, and reliability. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated using R and JAMOVI softwares. Results The WCST demonstrated the highest specificity (0.850) and strong evidence for detecting cognitive impairments (BF10 = 5.24E + 13, p < 0.001). The WMS-III showed the highest sensitivity (0.700) and accuracy (0.625). MoCA scores improved slightly from T1 (mean = 23.03) to T2 (mean = 24.56), but its reliability varied. The LTT provided moderate evidence for detecting impairments (p = 0.026, BF10 = 0.9778). Socioeconomic status and education significantly influenced cognitive performance, with 46.8% diagnosed with MCI. Agreement between human diagnosis and tool-based assessments was significant (p < 0.001), particularly for WCST and WMS-III. Conclusion The WCST and WMS-III are the most reliable tools for detecting MCI, excelling in specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Combining multiple tests enhances diagnostic accuracy. Future research should explore larger populations and integrate advanced methods like neuroimaging. Highlights center dot Combined Tests: Integrating multiple tools enhances diagnostic accuracy for MCI. center dot MoCA: Effective for longitudinal cognitive assessments despite test-retest variability. center dot WCST: Most reliable tool for detecting cognitive impairments in older adults. center dot WMS-III: Superior sensitivity for identifying memory-related deficits.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Cog screening tool for the detection of cognitive impairment-A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Abayomi, Simisola Naomi ;
Sritharan, Praveen ;
Yan, Ellene ;
Saripella, Aparna ;
Alhamdah, Yasmin ;
Englesakis, Marina ;
Tartaglia, Maria Carmela ;
He, David ;
Chung, Frances .
PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03)
[2]  
Connolly EM., 2024, A systematicreview. Journal of Alzheimers Disease, V101, P715, DOI [10.3233/JAD-231466, DOI 10.3233/JAD-231466]
[3]   The Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the Diagnostic Evaluation, Testing, Counseling, and Disclosure of Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Executive summary of recommendations for specialty care [J].
Dickerson, Bradford C. ;
Atri, Alireza ;
Clevenger, Carolyn ;
Karlawish, Jason ;
Knopman, David ;
Lin, Pei-Jung ;
Norman, Mary ;
Onyike, Chiadi ;
Sano, Mary ;
Scanland, Susan ;
Carrillo, Maria .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2025, 21 (01)
[4]  
Jakovljevic M, 2021, Handbook of global health, P73
[5]   Aging populations and expenditures on health [J].
Kallestrup-Lamb, Malene ;
Marin, Alexander O. K. ;
Menon, Seetha ;
Sogaard, Jes .
JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF AGEING, 2024, 29
[6]   Systematic review of memory assessment in virtual reality: evaluating convergent and divergent validity with traditional neuropsychological measures [J].
Mancuso, Valentina ;
Sarcinella, Eleonora Diletta ;
Bruni, Francesca ;
Arlati, Sara ;
Di Santo, Simona Gabriella ;
Cavallo, Marco ;
Cipresso, Pietro ;
Pedroli, Elisa .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
[7]   Overlooked cases of mild cognitive impairment: Implications to early Alzheimer's disease [J].
Mian, Maamoon ;
Tahiri, Jihane ;
Eldin, Ryan ;
Altabaa, Mohamad ;
Sehar, Ujala ;
Reddy, P. Hemachandra .
AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2024, 98
[8]   Sex and gender differences in social participation among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review [J].
Ong, Chuan Hong ;
Pham, Bang Linh ;
Levasseur, Melanie ;
Tan, Guang Rong ;
Seah, Betsy .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
[9]   Normative Data for Adult Mandarin-Speaking Populations: A Systematic Review of Performance-Based Neuropsychological Instruments [J].
Qi, Wei ;
Sun, Xiaoning ;
Hong, Yue .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 28 (05) :520-540
[10]   Advances in Alzheimer's disease: A multifaceted review of potential therapies and diagnostic techniques for early detection [J].
Sharma, Monika ;
Pal, Pankaj ;
Gupta, Sukesh Kumar .
NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 177