Impact of relative estradiol changes during ovarian stimulation on blastocyst formation and live birth in assisted reproductive technology

被引:0
|
作者
Wenjie Huang [1 ]
Liuyan Wei [2 ]
Juan Tang [1 ]
Liuying Nong [1 ]
Ni Tang [1 ]
Qiuyue Wen [1 ]
Zuxing Qin [2 ]
Lixiang Xu [2 ]
Jingjing Li [2 ]
Li Fan [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical center Liuzhou Hospital,Department of Reproductive Medicine
[2] Liuzhou maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital,undefined
[3] Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology,undefined
[4] Liuzhou Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Tumor,undefined
关键词
IVF/ICSI outcomes; Estrogen; Controlled ovarian stimulation; Ovarian response; Pregnancy outcomes;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-00200-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of relative change in E2 levels during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) on embryo development and pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). We retrospectively analyzed 9,376 patients who underwent their first fresh ART cycle from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Patients were classified into four groups based on relative change in E2 levels: low response group, moderate response group, moderate-high response group, and high response group. The primary outcomes were blastocyst formation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate, while secondary outcomes included miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate. Most cycles (96.5%) demonstrated an increase in E2 levels during COS. The blastocyst formation rate significantly increased across the groups (low response group: 0.13, moderate response group: 0.21, moderate-high response group: 0.28, high response group: 0.34; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher blastocyst formation rates in the moderate response group (adjusted OR = 2.012, 95% CI: 1.687–2.399), moderate-high response group (adjusted OR = 4.613, 95% CI: 3.853–5.523), and high response group (adjusted OR = 11.295, 95% CI: 9.192–13.880) compared to the low response group. Both clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were significantly higher in the moderate-high response group and high response group compared to the low response group (clinical pregnancy rate: 54.5% and 61.5% vs. 35.5%, adjusted RR = 1.21 [95% CI: 1.03–1.42] and 1.27 [95% CI: 1.08–1.51]; live birth rate: 44.9% and 52.0% vs. 25.7%, adjusted RR = 1.27 [95% CI: 1.06–1.52] and 1.35 [95% CI: 1.11–1.64]). However, no significant differences were observed in either clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate between the moderate response group and low response group (clinical pregnancy rate: adjusted RR = 1.07 [95% CI: 0.91–1.25]; live birth rate: adjusted RR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.92–1.33]). No significant differences in miscarriage rate or ectopic pregnancy rate were observed across the groups. Higher E2 responses were associated with improved embryo development and better pregnancy outcomes.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Prothrombotic biomarkers during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology
    Hugon-Rodin, Justine
    Casini, Alessandro
    Benard, Julie
    Poncet, Antoine
    Raverot, Veronique
    Fontana, Pierre
    Vulliemoz, Nicolas
    Streuli, Isabelle
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (06) : 976 - 984
  • [2] Ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproductive technology: an update
    Howles, Colin M.
    Ezcurra, Diego
    Homburg, Roy
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2012, 7 (03) : 319 - 330
  • [3] Live Birth after Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Randomised Controlled Study
    Mahmoudinia, Maliheh
    Souizi, Behnaz
    Ebadi, Seyed Mohammad Reza
    Zakerinasab, Faezeh
    Sadeghi, Tahereh
    Mahmoudinia, Mahbobeh
    Hamdieh, Mostafa
    Hassani, Fatemeh
    Hosseini, Roya
    Kalantar, Seyed Mehdi
    Khazaei, Mozafar
    Kheradmand, Alireza
    Movaghar, Afarin Rahimi
    Moazzeni, Seyed Mohammad
    Pooransari, Parichehr
    Ramazanali, Fariba
    Shahhoseini, Maryam
    Tavalaee, Marziyeh
    Ashrafi, Mahnaz
    Alhalabi, Marwan
    Barra, Fabio
    Berga, Sarah L.
    Calagna, Gloria
    Franciscis, Pasquale De
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Madani, Tahereh
    Moini, Ashraf
    Nezhat, Camran
    Niroomanesh, Shirin
    Nouri, Kazem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2024, 18
  • [4] Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective
    Jirge, Padma Rekha
    Patil, Madhuri Milind
    Gutgutia, Rohit
    Shah, Jatin
    Govindarajan, Mridubhashini
    Roy, Varsha Samson
    Kaul-Mahajan, Nalini
    Sharara, Faddy I.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (02) : 112 - 125
  • [5] Does a hyperechogenic endometrial mass in the uterus during controlled ovarian stimulation affect assisted reproductive technology cycle outcomes?
    Deng, Ke
    Zhang, Mei
    Kong, Wei-Ya
    Liu, Wei
    Zhang, Ya-nan
    Yu, Qian
    Wu, Gui-hua
    Yan, Lei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 250 : 17 - 23
  • [6] Real-world practices of hormone monitoring during ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: a global online survey
    Sachs-Guedj, Noemie
    Hart, Roger
    Requena, Antonio
    Vergara, Vanessa
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [7] Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a strong predictor of live birth in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology
    Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
    Liss, Joanna
    Kunicki, Michal
    Jakiel, Grzegorz
    Wasniewski, Tomasz
    Woclawek-Potocka, Izabela
    Pastuszek, Ewa
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 14 (03) : 176 - 181
  • [8] Effects of ovarian stimulation protocols on outcomes of assisted reproductive technology in adenomyosis women: a retrospective cohort study
    Ge, Li
    Li, Yexing
    Guan, Shengnan
    Cui, Linlin
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [9] Past, Present, and Future of Gonadotropin Use in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation During Assisted Reproductive Techniques
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Anagnostou, Elli
    Mavrogianni, Depy
    Liokari, Emmanouela
    Dimitroulia, Evangelia
    Drakakis, Petros
    Loutradis, Dimitrios
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [10] Effectiveness of progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cui, Ling
    Lin, Yonghong
    Wang, Fang
    Chen, Chen
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 303 (03) : 615 - 630