Minimally invasive surgery for non-traumatic spontaneous intracerebral Hemorrhage: A network Meta-Analysis of multiple treatment modalities

被引:0
作者
Tariq, Rabeet [1 ]
Ahmed, Salaar [1 ]
Qamar, Mohammad Aadil [2 ]
Bajwa, Mohammad Hamza [1 ]
Rahman, Abdu R. [3 ]
Khan, Saad Akhtar [1 ,4 ]
Nasir, Roua [1 ]
Das, Jai Kumar [5 ]
机构
[1] Aga Khan Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Sect Neurosurg, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] Ziauddin Univ, Karachi, Pakistan
[3] Aga Khan Univ, Inst Global Hlth & Dev, Karachi, Pakistan
[4] Liaquat Natl Hosp & Med Coll, Dept Neurosurg, Karachi, Pakistan
[5] Aga Khan Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat & Child Hlth, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词
Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage; Minimally Invasive Surgery; Non-traumatic Hemorrhage; Stroke; SPONTANEOUS PUTAMINAL HEMORRHAGE; INITIAL CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; STEREOTACTIC ASPIRATION; HEMATOMA EVACUATION; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; STROKE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111196
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage (SICH) is a severe condition with high mortality and morbidity, annually affecting around 2 million people globally. Current treatment guidelines emphasize medical management however, Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), including stereotactic and endoscopic approaches, has shown promise in improving outcomes. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of MIS with conventional craniotomy, burrhole catheter insertion, and medical treatment for the management of SICH. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search across three databases to identify relevant studies. Data extracted included demographics, treatment outcomes, and adverse effects, while the quality of studies was assessed using the NHLBI tool. A network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio to compare the effectiveness of MIS approaches with other treatment modalities. Results: MIS for SICH was more effective than conservative medical management in reducing mortality (OR: 1.991; 95% CI, 1.364-2.907) but did not show a mortality benefit compared to conventional surgery, external ventricular drainage (EVD), or burr hole procedures. MIS had similar hematoma evacuation rates to conventional surgery and burr hole drainage but required significantly less operating time (SMD: 3.837; 95% CI, 2.851-4.823) and reduced ICU stay (SMD: 4.436; 95% CI, 2.386-6.486). Conventional surgery had higher risks of blood loss, seizures, GI bleed/ulceration, and pneumonia/RTI, while MIS showed a safer profile regarding these complications. There was no significant difference in rebleeding (OR: 1.492; 95% CI, 0.632-3.522) or reoperation rates (OR: 0.494; 95% CI, 0.120-2.039) between MIS, conventional surgery, and conservative treatment. Conclusion: MIS significantly reduces mortality compared to conservative treatment while offering similar outcomes to other surgeries. MIS also has advantages like shorter operating times, reduced ICU stays, and fewer complications, making it a promising alternative for managing SICH.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [11] Deinsberger W, 2003, ZBL NEUROCHIR, V64, P145
  • [12] Predicting Intracerebral Hemorrhage Growth With the Spot Sign The Effect of Onset-to-Scan Time
    Dowlatshahi, Dar
    Brouwers, H. Bart
    Demchuk, Andrew M.
    Hill, Michael D.
    Aviv, Richard I.
    Ufholz, Lee-Anne
    Reaume, Michael
    Wintermark, Max
    Hemphill, J. Claude, III
    Murai, Yasuo
    Wang, Yongjun
    Zhao, Xingquan
    Wang, Yilong
    Li, Na
    Sorimachi, Takatoshi
    Matsumae, Mitsunori
    Steiner, Thorsten
    Rizos, Timolaos
    Greenberg, Steven M.
    Romero, Javier M.
    Rosand, Jonathan
    Goldstein, Joshua N.
    Sharma, Mukul
    [J]. STROKE, 2016, 47 (03) : 695 - 700
  • [13] Endoscopic surgery versus craniotomy in the treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Du X.
    Lin X.
    Wang C.
    Zhou K.
    Wei Y.
    Tian X.
    [J]. Chinese Neurosurgical Journal, 8 (1)
  • [14] Surgical Management of Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhages: Endoscopic Versus Open Surgery
    Eroglu, Umit
    Kahilogullari, Gokmen
    Dogan, Ihsan
    Yakar, Fatih
    Al-Beyati, Eyyub S. M.
    Ozgural, Onur
    Cohen-Gadol, Aaron A.
    Ugur, Hasan Caglar
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 114 : E60 - E65
  • [15] Endoscope-Assisted Keyhole Technique for Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage in Elderly Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study in 184 Patients
    Feng, Yi
    He, Jianqing
    Liu, Bin
    Yang, Likun
    Wang, Yuhai
    [J]. TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 26 (01) : 84 - 89
  • [16] Long term survival after primary intracerebral haemorrhage: a retrospective population based study
    Fogelholm, R
    Murros, K
    Rissanen, A
    Avikainen, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 76 (11) : 1534 - 1538
  • [17] Fujita Naohide, 2021, Surg Neurol Int, V12, P121, DOI 10.25259/SNI_872_2020
  • [18] 3D-Printed Endoport vs. Open Surgery for Evacuation of Deep Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    Garcia-Estrada, Everardo
    Morales-Gomez, Jesus Alberto
    Garza-Baez, Azalea
    Sotomayor-Gonzalez, Arturo
    Palacios-Ortiz, Isaac Jair
    Mercado-Flores, Mariana
    Martinez-Ponce de Leon, Angel Raymundo
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 49 (05) : 636 - 643
  • [19] Hemicraniectomy for Supratentorial Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matched Study
    Gildersleeve, Kasey L.
    Hirzallah, Mohammad, I
    Esquenazi, Yoshua
    Moomaw, Charles J.
    Sekar, Padmini
    Cai, Chunyan
    Tandon, Nitin
    Woo, Daniel
    Gonzales, Nicole R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 28 (11)
  • [20] Minimally invasive endoscopic hematoma evacuation vs best medical management for spontaneous basal-ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage
    Goyal, Nitin
    Tsivgoulis, Georgios
    Malhotra, Konark
    Katsanos, Aristeidis H.
    Pandhi, Abhi
    Alsherbini, Khalid A.
    Chang, Jason J.
    Hoit, Daniel
    Alexandrov, Andrei V.
    Elijovich, Lucas
    Fiorella, David
    Nickele, Christopher
    Arthur, Adam S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2019, 11 (06) : 579 - 583