Improving value-concordant shared decision making through the use of patient decision aids in breast cancer: a narrative review

被引:0
作者
Roy, Micaela K. [1 ]
Higgins, Madeline G. [2 ]
Adams, Monica [3 ,4 ]
Tevis, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Sch Med, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Dept Surg, 12631 E 17th Ave,6117, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Adult & Child Ctr Outcomes Res & Delivery Sci ACCO, Aurora, CO USA
[4] Univ Houston, Dept Psychol Hlth & Learning Sci, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Breast cancer; patient decision aids (pDAs); breast conserving therapy; mastectomy; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SUPPORT INTERVENTIONS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; SURGERY; MASTECTOMY; QUALITY; WOMEN; IMPLEMENTATION; INVOLVEMENT; LUMPECTOMY;
D O I
10.21037/abs-24-33
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Patient decision aids (pDAs) are evidence-based tools that aid patients in making informed, value-based choices about their medical treatment. In breast cancer surgery, pDAs help patients weigh the physical and emotional consequences between treatment options e.g. between breast conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. Despite their utility, pDAs are not widely used. In this narrative review, we aim to increase pDA awareness in breast cancer surgical care by discussing outcomes of pDAs, best practices for developing and adapting pDAs, and challenges of pDA implementation. Methods: We performed a database search and literature review of studies that discuss the use of pDAs in breast cancer surgical treatment published from 1994-2024. Key Content and Findings: Decision aids are effective in facilitating shared decision making in the medical setting. In breast cancer surgical care, pDAs have been shown to increase patient knowledge, improve patient satisfaction with decision, lower pain scores, and improve general health and functioning after surgery. Decision aids have varying effects on the choice of BCS versus mastectomy. Effective pDAs for breast cancer surgery are developed systematically using defined standards and are iteratively tested to ensure they are usable in diverse populations. Various barriers impede pDA use in breast cancer surgical care. These barriers include patient reluctance, provider reluctance, provider lack of knowledge, short appointment times, and limited support for providers. Potential strategies to overcome these barriers include provider education, increased physician buy-in, and the utilization of multidisciplinary teams. Future pDA development for breast cancer surgical care should continue to prioritize patient and provider feedback and include patient reported outcomes and quality of life measures. Conclusions: As breast cancer prognosis improves and patient survival increases, pDAs will continue to be essential in helping patients decide what treatments align best with their long-term values and goals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [51] Are We Improving? Update and Critical Appraisal of the Reporting of Decision Process and Quality Measures in Trials Evaluating Patient Decision Aids
    Trenaman, Logan
    Jansen, Jesse
    Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer
    Koerner, Mirjam
    Lally, Joanne
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Ropka, Mary
    Stirling, Christine
    Valentine, Kathrene
    Vo, Ha
    Wills, Celia E.
    Thomson, Richard
    Sepucha, Karen
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 954 - 959
  • [52] A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Web-Based Information on Breast Cancer Patients' Knowledge of Surgical Treatment Options
    Tucholka, Jennifer L.
    Yang, Dou-Yan
    Bruce, Jordan G.
    Steffens, Nicole M.
    Schumacher, Jessica R.
    Greenberg, Caprice C.
    Wilke, Lee G.
    Steiman, Jennifer
    Neuman, Heather B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [53] User Involvement in the Design and Development of Patient Decision Aids and Other Personal Health Tools: A Systematic Review
    Vaisson, Gratianne
    Provencher, Thierry
    Dugas, Michele
    Trottier, Marie-Eve
    Chipenda Dansokho, Selma
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Giguere, Anik M. C.
    Hakim, Hina
    Haslett, Lynne
    Hoffman, Aubri S.
    Ivers, Noah M.
    Julien, Anne-Sophie
    Legare, France
    Renaud, Jean-Sebastien
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert J.
    Witteman, Holly O.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (03) : 261 - 274
  • [54] Assessing the quality and communicative aspects of patient decision aids for early-stage breast cancer treatment: a systematic review
    Vromans, Ruben
    Tenfelde, Kim
    Pauws, Steffen
    van Eenbergen, Mies
    Mares-Engelberts, Ingeborg
    Velikova, Galina
    van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke
    Krahmer, Emiel
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 178 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [55] The Choice for Breast Cancer Surgery: Can Women Accurately Predict Postoperative Quality of Life and Disease-Related Stigma?
    Waljee, Jennifer F.
    Ubel, Peter A.
    Atisha, Dunya M.
    Hu, Emily S.
    Alderman, Amy K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (09) : 2477 - 2482
  • [56] Mastectomy or lumpectomy? Helping women make informed choices
    Whelan, T
    Levine, M
    Gafni, A
    Sanders, K
    Willan, A
    Mirsky, D
    Schnider, D
    McCready, D
    Reid, S
    Kobylecky, A
    Reed, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (06) : 1727 - 1735
  • [57] Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery - A randomized trial
    Whelan, T
    Levine, M
    Willan, A
    Gafni, A
    Sanders, K
    Mirsky, D
    Chambers, S
    O'Brien, MA
    Reid, S
    Dubois, S
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (04): : 435 - 441
  • [58] Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration
    Witteman, Holly O.
    Maki, Kristin G.
    Vaisson, Gratianne
    Finderup, Jeanette
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Dahl Steffensen, Karina
    Beaudoin, Caroline
    Comeau, Sandrine
    Volk, Robert J.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 736 - 754
  • [59] Bridging the age gap in breast cancer: cluster randomized trial of two decision support interventions for older women with operable breast cancer on quality of life, survival, decision quality, and treatment choices
    Wyld, L.
    Reed, M. W. R.
    Collins, K.
    Burton, M.
    Lifford, K.
    Edwards, A.
    Ward, S.
    Holmes, G.
    Morgan, J.
    Bradburn, M.
    Walters, S. J.
    Ring, A.
    Robinson, T. G.
    Martin, C.
    Chater, T.
    Pemberton, K.
    Shrestha, A.
    Nettleship, A.
    Murray, C.
    Brown, M.
    Richards, P.
    Cheung, K. L.
    Todd, A.
    Harder, H.
    Brain, K.
    Audisio, R. A.
    Wright, J.
    Simcock, R.
    Armitage, F.
    Bursnall, M.
    Green, T.
    Revell, D.
    Gath, J.
    Horgan, K.
    Holcombe, C.
    Winter, M.
    Naik, J.
    Parmeshwar, R.
    Gosney, M.
    Hatton, M.
    Thompson, A. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (05) : 499 - 510
  • [60] A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancer
    Zdenkowski, Nicholas
    Butow, Phyllis
    Tesson, Stephanie
    Boyle, Frances
    [J]. BREAST, 2016, 26 : 31 - 45