Improving value-concordant shared decision making through the use of patient decision aids in breast cancer: a narrative review

被引:0
作者
Roy, Micaela K. [1 ]
Higgins, Madeline G. [2 ]
Adams, Monica [3 ,4 ]
Tevis, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Sch Med, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Dept Surg, 12631 E 17th Ave,6117, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Adult & Child Ctr Outcomes Res & Delivery Sci ACCO, Aurora, CO USA
[4] Univ Houston, Dept Psychol Hlth & Learning Sci, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Breast cancer; patient decision aids (pDAs); breast conserving therapy; mastectomy; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SUPPORT INTERVENTIONS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; SURGERY; MASTECTOMY; QUALITY; WOMEN; IMPLEMENTATION; INVOLVEMENT; LUMPECTOMY;
D O I
10.21037/abs-24-33
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Patient decision aids (pDAs) are evidence-based tools that aid patients in making informed, value-based choices about their medical treatment. In breast cancer surgery, pDAs help patients weigh the physical and emotional consequences between treatment options e.g. between breast conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. Despite their utility, pDAs are not widely used. In this narrative review, we aim to increase pDA awareness in breast cancer surgical care by discussing outcomes of pDAs, best practices for developing and adapting pDAs, and challenges of pDA implementation. Methods: We performed a database search and literature review of studies that discuss the use of pDAs in breast cancer surgical treatment published from 1994-2024. Key Content and Findings: Decision aids are effective in facilitating shared decision making in the medical setting. In breast cancer surgical care, pDAs have been shown to increase patient knowledge, improve patient satisfaction with decision, lower pain scores, and improve general health and functioning after surgery. Decision aids have varying effects on the choice of BCS versus mastectomy. Effective pDAs for breast cancer surgery are developed systematically using defined standards and are iteratively tested to ensure they are usable in diverse populations. Various barriers impede pDA use in breast cancer surgical care. These barriers include patient reluctance, provider reluctance, provider lack of knowledge, short appointment times, and limited support for providers. Potential strategies to overcome these barriers include provider education, increased physician buy-in, and the utilization of multidisciplinary teams. Future pDA development for breast cancer surgical care should continue to prioritize patient and provider feedback and include patient reported outcomes and quality of life measures. Conclusions: As breast cancer prognosis improves and patient survival increases, pDAs will continue to be essential in helping patients decide what treatments align best with their long-term values and goals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Assessing the acceptability and feasibility of encounter decision aids for early stage breast cancer targeted at underserved patients
    Alam, Shama
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Percac-Lima, Sanja
    Grande, Stuart
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 16 : 1 - 13
  • [2] How does a German audience appraise an American decision aid on early stage breast cancer?
    Albrecht, Karoline
    Simon, Daniela
    Buchholz, Angela
    Reuter, Katrin
    Frosch, Dominick
    Seebauer, Laura
    Haerter, Martin
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 83 (01) : 58 - 63
  • [3] Shared Decision Making - The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care
    Barry, Michael J.
    Edgman-Levitan, Susan
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (09) : 780 - 781
  • [4] Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study
    Bhavnani, Vanita
    Fisher, Brian
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2010, 13 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [5] Knowledge creation: synthesis, tools and products
    Brouwers, Melissa
    Stacey, Dawn
    O'Connor, Annette
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (02) : E68 - E72
  • [6] Clinicians' concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making
    Caldon, Lisa J. M.
    Collins, Karen A.
    Reed, Malcolm W.
    Sivell, Stephanie
    Austoker, Joan
    Clements, Alison M.
    Patnick, Julietta
    Elwyn, Glyn
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 (02) : 133 - 146
  • [7] Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy have a Better Survival than Mastectomy? A Meta-Analysis of More than 1,500,000 Patients
    De la Cruz-Ku, Gabriel A.
    Karamchandani, Manish
    Chambergo-Michilot, Diego
    Narvaez-Rojas, Alexis R.
    Jonczyk, Michael
    Principe-Meneses, Fortunato S.
    Posawatz, David
    Nardello, Salvatore
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (10) : 6163 - 6188
  • [8] Involving members of vulnerable populations in the development of patient decision aids: a mixed methods sequential explanatory study
    Dugas, Michele
    Trottier, Marie-Eve
    Dansokho, Selma Chipenda
    Vaisson, Gratianne
    Provencher, Thierry
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Dogba, Maman Joyce
    Dupere, Sophie
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Giguere, Anik M. C.
    Haslett, Lynne
    Hoffman, Aubri S.
    Ivers, Noah M.
    Legare, France
    Legare, Jean
    Levin, Carrie A.
    Menear, Matthew
    Renaud, Jean-Sebastien
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert J.
    Witteman, Holly O.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 17 : 1 - 11
  • [9] What matters most: Randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery conversation aids across socioeconomic strata
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Yen, Renata W.
    O'Malley, A. James
    Schubbe, Danielle
    Politi, Mary C.
    Saunders, Catherine H.
    Dhage, Shubhada
    Rosenkranz, Kari
    Margenthaler, Julie
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Crayton, Eloise
    Jackson, Sherrill
    Bradley, Ann
    Walling, Linda
    Marx, Christine M.
    Volk, Robert J.
    Sepucha, Karen
    Ozanne, Elissa
    Percac-Lima, Sanja
    Bergin, Emily
    Goodwin, Courtney
    Miller, Caity
    Harris, Camille
    Barth, Richard J., Jr.
    Aft, Rebecca
    Feldman, Sheldon
    Cyr, Amy E.
    Angeles, Christina V.
    Jiang, Shuai
    Elwyn, Glyn
    [J]. CANCER, 2021, 127 (03) : 422 - 436
  • [10] Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Connor, Annette
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert
    Edwards, Adrian
    Coulter, Angela
    Thomson, Richard
    Barrat, Alexandra
    Butow, Phyllis
    Barry, Michael
    Mulley, Albert G.
    Sepucha, Karen
    Bernstein, Steven
    Clarke, Aileen
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Feldman-Stewart, Deb
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary
    Moumjid, Nora
    Ruland, Cornelia
    Sykes, Alan
    Whelan, Tim
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565): : 417 - 419