Dicamba-based preemergence herbicide tank mixtures improved residual weed control in dicamba-resistant soybean

被引:0
|
作者
Dhanda, Sachin [1 ]
Singh, Navjot [1 ]
Ikley, Joseph T. [2 ]
Dewerff, Ryan P. [3 ]
Werle, Rodrigo [3 ]
Sarangi, Debalin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Agron & Plant Genet, St Paul, MN 55455 USA
[2] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, Fargo, ND USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Plant & Agroecosyst Sci, Madison, WI USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN AGRONOMY | 2025年 / 7卷
关键词
dicamba ruling; herbicide mixture; premix; residual herbicide; resistance management; CRITICAL TIME; RAGWEED; MANAGEMENT; WATERHEMP; REMOVAL; CORN;
D O I
10.3389/fagro.2025.1576547
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In February 2024, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) vacated the registrations of dicamba products for over-the-top applications on dicamba-resistant cotton and soybean following a court ruling. This decision has raised significant concerns among United States farmers, who now have limited chemical options to manage tough-to-control weeds. However, the risk of off-target dicamba movement to sensitive plants remains a critical issue. If permitted in the future, applying dicamba as a preemergence (PRE) treatment, tank-mixed with other soil residual herbicides, could help reduce off-target movement while preserving its utility for managing problem weeds. Field experiments were conducted in 2022 and 2023 in Minnesota and North Dakota, and in 2021 and 2022 in Wisconsin, to evaluate the effectiveness of dicamba-based PRE herbicide mixtures in soybean. Across all site-years, dicamba tank mixed with other soil residual herbicides provided better control of targeted weed species at 21 d after treatment (DAT) compared to applying the residual herbicides alone. In Minnesota, dicamba-based herbicide tank mixes provided an average waterhemp control of 72%, compared to 59% for treatments without dicamba at 21 DAT. Similarly, in North Dakota, waterhemp control at 21 DAT improved from 74% with residual herbicides alone to 97% when tank mixed with dicamba. In Wisconsin, dicamba-based tank mixes resulted in 96% control of common ragweed and 83% of velvetleaf, versus 83% and 73% for those species, respectively, without dicamba. At the Minnesota site, adding dicamba to residual herbicides improved common lambsquarters and giant ragweed control by 17% and 20%, respectively, and their densities were reduced by at least 50%. At the North Dakota site, kochia control was improved by 23% with dicamba PRE. The results from this research outlined the effectiveness of PRE application of dicamba tank mixed with other residual herbicides for effective weed management in the Upper Midwest.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp with preemergence herbicides in glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 99 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [2] Benefit of tank mixing dicamba with glyphosate applied after emergence for weed control in dicamba- and glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Underwood, M. G.
    Soltani, N.
    Hooker, D. C.
    Robinson, D. E.
    Vink, J. P.
    Swanton, C. J.
    Sikkema, P. H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 97 (05) : 891 - 901
  • [3] Influence of Postemergence Dicamba/Glyphosate Timing and Inclusion of Acetochlor as a Layered Residual on Weed Control and Soybean Yield
    Striegel, Sarah
    Oliveira, Maxwel C.
    DeWerff, Ryan P.
    Stoltenberg, David E.
    Conley, Shawn P.
    Werle, Rodrigo
    FRONTIERS IN AGRONOMY, 2021, 3
  • [4] Weed control, environmental impact, and net revenue of two-pass weed management strategies in dicamba-resistant soybean
    Underwood, Matthew G.
    Soltani, Nader
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Hooker, David C.
    Swanton, Clarence J.
    Vink, Joseph P.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 98 (02) : 370 - 379
  • [5] Evaluating cereal rye and crimson clover for weed suppression within buffer areas in dicamba-resistant soybean
    Hodgskiss, Connor L.
    Young, Bryan G.
    Armstrong, Shalamar D.
    Johnson, William G.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 404 - 411
  • [6] Planting date and dicamba-based herbicide programs influence soybean production in the Southern Great Plains
    Kezar, Sarah
    Kankarla, Vanaja
    Lofton, Josh
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 7 (02)
  • [7] Economics of herbicide programs for weed control in conventional, glufosinate, and dicamba/glyphosate-resistant soybean across Nebraska
    Striegel, Adam
    Eskridge, Kent M.
    Lawrence, Nevin C.
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    Kruger, Greg R.
    Proctor, Christopher A.
    Hein, Gary L.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2020, 112 (06) : 5158 - 5179
  • [8] Effective two-pass herbicide programs to control glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean
    Kumar, Vipan
    Liu, Rui
    Peterson, Dallas E.
    Stahlman, Phillip W.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (01) : 128 - 135
  • [9] Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Response to Micro-Rates of Three Dicamba-Based Herbicides
    Osipitan, O. Adewale
    Scott, Jon E.
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 2 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [10] Shortening critical period of weed control at soybean by residual herbicide mixtures
    Roncatto, Eduardo
    Barroso, Arthur A. M.
    Albrecht, Alfredo J. P.
    Novello, Bruna D.
    Silva, Renan G.
    Backes, Caroline B. W.
    ADVANCES IN WEED SCIENCE, 2023, 41