Electronic cigarette use, related health outcomes and policy interventions in the USA: a call for research to fill evidence gaps

被引:0
作者
Nighbor, Tyler [1 ]
Wang, Shanshan [1 ]
Xue, Zheng [1 ]
Asare, Samuel [1 ]
Orr-Souza, Eva [1 ]
Patel, Minal [1 ]
Bandi, Priti [2 ]
Westmaas, Johann Lee [1 ]
Jemal, Ahmedin [3 ]
Nargis, Nigar [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Canc Soc, Tobacco Control Res Surveillance & Hlth Equ Sci, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Risk Factors & Screening Surveillance Res, Surveillance & Hlth Equ Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Amer Canc Soc, Surveillance & Hlth Equ Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Electronic nicotine delivery devices; Non-cigarette tobacco products; Public policy; HIGH-SCHOOL-STUDENTS; TOBACCO; SMOKING; IMPACT; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1136/tc-2024-059019
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
The population-level health consequences of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use are heavily debated. This special communication provides updated evidence and identifies knowledge gaps across domains including: (1) health-related outcomes associated with e-cigarette use; (2) initiation and use of e-cigarettes among youth and young adults; (3) concurrent use of electronic and combustible cigarettes; (4) transitions from combustible cigarette use to exclusive e-cigarette use among adults who currently smoke cigarettes and (5) existing e-cigarette-related policy interventions. Literature was searched through PubMed and Medline for systematic reviews, scoping reviews, meta-analyses and primary research articles including emerging topics not covered in reviews published between 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2024. E-cigarette use is associated with several adverse acute health outcomes; there is currently insufficient longitudinal evidence to predict chronic health outcomes. Prevalence of e-cigarette use among youth is considerable and may be associated with subsequent combustible cigarette smoking. Evidence for the health and behavioural impact of dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes is limited by imprecise measurement of exposure. Evidence on adults completely substituting combustible cigarettes for e-cigarettes is strong in clinical trials; observational studies do not show complete substitution. Finally, the effects of e-cigarette-related policy interventions to restrict e-cigarette consumption are currently limited in scope and too short-lived to draw causal inferences. Substantial evidence gaps related to the use, associated health impacts and regulation of e-cigarettes in the USA are identified, and we suggest key areas for future research to address that are crucial for informing the public health approach to e-cigarettes.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 73 条
[71]  
Yang Y., The impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three US states
[72]   A systematic review of consumer preference for e-cigarette attributes: Flavor, nicotine strength, and type [J].
Zare, Samane ;
Nemati, Mehdi ;
Zheng, Yuqing .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03)
[73]   Is electronic cigarette use a risk factor for stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhao, Kai ;
Li, Jing ;
Zhou, Ping ;
Xu, Ling ;
Yang, Mingfei .
TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2022, 20