The Question Mark Question: Wound Healing after Hemicraniectomy

被引:0
作者
Fassina, Grace R. [1 ]
Nguyen, Emily E. [1 ]
Cho, David [1 ]
Williams, Drake J. [1 ]
Evans, Alexander R. [1 ]
Pelargos, Panayiotis E. [2 ]
Graffeo, Christopher S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Neurosurg, 1000 N Lincoln Blvd 4000, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 USA
[2] Washington Univ St Louis, Dept Neurosurg, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
reverse question mark; retroauricular; wound complications; decompressive hemicraniectomy; DECOMPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; INCISION;
D O I
10.1055/a-2561-7951
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction The reverse question mark (RQM) incision is the conventional scalp flap technique incorporated during decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) operations. Recently, the retroauricular (RA) incision emerged as a possible alternative. We sought to assess the contemporary literature regarding postoperative outcomes following RQM or RA for DHC and subsequent cranioplasty. Methods MEDLINE and Embase databases were queried using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting outcomes after primary DHC and secondary cranioplasty for both RQM and RA were included in a meta-analysis of proportions performed using random-effects modeling. Results Five manuscripts representing a total of 511 patients met the inclusion criteria. No difference was observed in the rate of primary surgical site infection (SSI) after RQM as compared with RA (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 0.92-2.92). Similarly, based on those four studies reporting SSI data after cranioplasty, no difference was detected in secondary SSI rates between RQM and RA (OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 0.79-4.72). Patients who underwent primary RQM had increased odds of undergoing cranioplasty compared with patients who had received a primary RA (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.03-2.39). Conclusion This novel systematic review and meta-analysis reported postoperative outcomes after DHC using either the RQM or RA incision technique. No significant difference was noted in SSI after either the primary decompression or the secondary cranioplasty. These findings support the use of either technique in routine practice, as guided by surgeon preference or other clinical considerations, such as superficial temporal artery preservation for an unrelated future indication.
引用
收藏
页码:e77 / e82
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques
    Brown, Nolan J.
    Gendreau, Julian
    Rahmani, Redi
    Catapano, Joshua S.
    Lawton, Michael T.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [2] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [3] The Retroauricular Incision as an Effective and Safe Alternative Incision for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy
    Dowlati, Ehsan
    Mortazavi, Armin
    Keating, Gregory
    Jha, Ribhu Tushar
    Felbaum, Daniel R.
    Chang, Jason J.
    Nair, Mani N.
    Mason, Robert B.
    Aulisi, Edward F.
    Armonda, Rocco A.
    Mai, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 20 (06) : 549 - 557
  • [4] Craniectomy size and decompression of the temporal base using the altered posterior question-mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy
    Frueh, A.
    Zdunczyk, A.
    Wolf, S.
    Mertens, R.
    Spindler, P.
    Wasilewski, D.
    Hecht, N.
    Bayerl, S.
    Onken, J.
    Wessels, L.
    Faust, K.
    Vajkoczy, P.
    Truckenmueller, P.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [5] Hoffman H., 2023, World Neurosurg, V24, pS1878
  • [6] Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review
    Kurland, David B.
    Khaladj-Ghom, Ariana
    Stokum, Jesse A.
    Carusillo, Brianna
    Karimy, Jason K.
    Gerzanich, Volodymyr
    Sahuquillo, Juan
    Simard, J. Marc
    [J]. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2015, 23 (02) : 292 - 304
  • [7] Novel Hemicraniectomy Technique for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Technical Note
    Lyon, Kristopher A.
    Patel, Nitesh P.
    Zhang, Yilu
    Huang, Jason H.
    Feng, Dongxia
    [J]. OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 17 (03) : 273 - 276
  • [8] Tissue Healing in Hemicraniectomy
    Nerntengian, Ntenis
    Abboud, Tammam
    Stepniewski, Adam
    Felmerer, Gunther
    Rohde, Veit
    Tanrikulu, Levent
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [9] Decompressive craniectomy: technical note
    Quinn, T. M.
    Taylor, J. J.
    Magarik, J. A.
    Vought, E.
    Kindy, M. S.
    Ellegala, D. B.
    [J]. ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 123 (04): : 239 - 244
  • [10] Operative wound-related complications after cranial revascularization surgeries
    Takanari, Keisuke
    Araki, Yoshio
    Okamoto, Sho
    Sato, Hideyoshi
    Yagi, Shunjiro
    Toriyama, Kazuhiro
    Yokoyama, Kinya
    Murotani, Kenta
    Matsui, Shigeyuki
    Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
    Kamei, Yuzuru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 123 (05) : 1145 - 1150