Recent patterns in minimally invasive colectomies: Where are we now?

被引:0
|
作者
Laredo, Jonathan A. [1 ]
Patel, Devanshi [1 ]
Byerly, Saskya [1 ]
Filiberto, Dina M. [1 ]
Wood, Elizabeth H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
来源
LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY | 2025年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
Robotic surgery; Laparoscopy; Colectomy; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; COLON-CANCER; FUNDAMENTALS; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lers.2024.09.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery for colorectal resection have been cited as superior to traditional open surgery because of their associations with decreased operating room time, hospital stay length, and postoperative morbidity. Despite these benefits, the open approach remains a common surgical method for colorectal resection procedures. We aim to evaluate the most recent yearly trends in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches to provide insight into uptake and present the status of MIS in the field of colorectal surgery. Methods: Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted colectomy database for the years 2014-2020. The surgical approach was classified as either open, laparoscopic, or robotic. Analysis was performed to identify trends in colorectal surgery categorized by year, patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, body mass index (BMI), and emergency status. Results: There was an overall decline in both open and laparoscopic surgery cases (from 38.4% to 34.4% and from 57.4% to 50.8%, respectively) and an overall increase in robotic surgery cases (from 4.2% to 14.8%) from 2014 through 2020. Open surgery was the most common approach for the lowest BMI category (<18.5 kg/m2), highest risk ASA classes (4-5) and most emergent surgeries, whereas robotic surgery rates were negligible for these groups. Laparoscopy was the most prevalent approach for all other categories. Conclusion: Laparoscopy was the most prevalent approach in colorectal surgery, although the total case proportions generally tended to decrease. While open surgery remains the approach of choice for emergent procedures, laparoscopic case proportions increased marginally in this category, likely owing to increases in surgeon comfort and continued expansion of laparoscopic training efforts. Importantly, the total prevalence of robotic surgery increased significantly between 2014 and 2020, which may be attributable to advancements in the robotic platform and increases in familiarity and competence with the technology. We anticipate a continuation of these trends in the future and recommend the creation of a national robotic surgery training standard. (c) 2024 Zhejiang University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 27
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is open pancreatic surgery still relevant now in the era of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery?
    Chan, Kai Siang
    Shelat, Vishal G.
    Junnarkar, Sameer P.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2024, 13 (04) : 584 - 589
  • [22] Recommended care received by geriatric hip fracture patients: where are we now and where are we heading?
    Seys, Deborah
    Sermon, An
    Sermeus, Walter
    Panella, Massimiliano
    Bruyneel, Luk
    Boto, Paulo
    Vanhaecht, Kris
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2018, 138 (08) : 1077 - 1087
  • [23] Robotic colorectal surgery: where are we right now?
    Kang, J.
    Lee, K. Y.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2010, 224 (C7) : 1415 - 1419
  • [25] Oncoplastic Surgery: Where Are We Now?
    Clark, Patricia
    DiPasquale, Ashley
    Cocco, Daniela
    Brown, Andrew
    Brown, Ashley
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, : 124 - 132
  • [26] Augmented reality (AR) in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) training: where are we now in Italy? The Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery (SICE) ARMIS survey
    Balla, Andrea
    Sartori, Alberto
    Botteri, Emanuele
    Podda, Mauro
    Ortenzi, Monica
    Silecchia, Gianfranco
    Guerrieri, Mario
    Agresta, Ferdinando
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [27] Surgery in space: Where are we at now?
    Drudi, Laura
    Ball, Chad G.
    Kirkpatrick, Andrew W.
    Saary, Joan
    Grenon, S. Marlene
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2012, 79 : 61 - 66
  • [28] Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: where are we now and where are we going?
    Huang, Lei
    Li, Tuan-Jie
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (11) : 1145 - 1157
  • [29] Management of early colonic neoplasia: where are we now and where are we heading?
    Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 11 (03) : 227 - 236
  • [30] Acute coronary syndrome in Australia: Where are we now and where are we going?
    Nadel, James
    Hewitt, Timothy
    Horton, Damien
    AUSTRALASIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 8 (11): : 149 - 156