Recent patterns in minimally invasive colectomies: Where are we now?

被引:0
|
作者
Laredo, Jonathan A. [1 ]
Patel, Devanshi [1 ]
Byerly, Saskya [1 ]
Filiberto, Dina M. [1 ]
Wood, Elizabeth H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
来源
LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY | 2025年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
Robotic surgery; Laparoscopy; Colectomy; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; COLON-CANCER; FUNDAMENTALS; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lers.2024.09.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery for colorectal resection have been cited as superior to traditional open surgery because of their associations with decreased operating room time, hospital stay length, and postoperative morbidity. Despite these benefits, the open approach remains a common surgical method for colorectal resection procedures. We aim to evaluate the most recent yearly trends in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches to provide insight into uptake and present the status of MIS in the field of colorectal surgery. Methods: Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted colectomy database for the years 2014-2020. The surgical approach was classified as either open, laparoscopic, or robotic. Analysis was performed to identify trends in colorectal surgery categorized by year, patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, body mass index (BMI), and emergency status. Results: There was an overall decline in both open and laparoscopic surgery cases (from 38.4% to 34.4% and from 57.4% to 50.8%, respectively) and an overall increase in robotic surgery cases (from 4.2% to 14.8%) from 2014 through 2020. Open surgery was the most common approach for the lowest BMI category (<18.5 kg/m2), highest risk ASA classes (4-5) and most emergent surgeries, whereas robotic surgery rates were negligible for these groups. Laparoscopy was the most prevalent approach for all other categories. Conclusion: Laparoscopy was the most prevalent approach in colorectal surgery, although the total case proportions generally tended to decrease. While open surgery remains the approach of choice for emergent procedures, laparoscopic case proportions increased marginally in this category, likely owing to increases in surgeon comfort and continued expansion of laparoscopic training efforts. Importantly, the total prevalence of robotic surgery increased significantly between 2014 and 2020, which may be attributable to advancements in the robotic platform and increases in familiarity and competence with the technology. We anticipate a continuation of these trends in the future and recommend the creation of a national robotic surgery training standard. (c) 2024 Zhejiang University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 27
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive THA: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Heading?
    Eskelinen, Antti
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (20)
  • [2] Minimally invasive surgery and gastric cancer: where are we now?
    Pappalardo, Vincenzo
    Rausei, Stefano
    Giacopuzzi, Simone
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2023, 8
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer: Where do we Stand in Europe?
    Klaus A.
    Fink M.
    Journal für Gastroenterologische und Hepatologische Erkrankungen, 2021, 19 (3) : 74 - 77
  • [4] Minimally invasive approach for the treatment of pancreatic pseudcyst. Transgastric drainage - where we are now?
    Perisic, Nenad
    Bezmarevic, Mihailo
    Doder, Radoje
    Mirkovic, Darko
    Brcerevic, Irina
    Petrovic, Stanko
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2020, 77 (12) : 1342 - 1347
  • [5] Evolution of Technique in Performance of Minimally Invasive Colectomies
    Jadlowiec, Caroline C.
    Mannion, Elizabeth M.
    Thielman, Mary J.
    Bartus, Christine M.
    Johnson, Kristina H.
    Sardella, William V.
    Vignati, Paul V.
    Cohen, Jeffrey L.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (09) : 1090 - 1097
  • [6] One Hundred and Two Consecutive Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Colectomies-An Outcome and Technical Update
    Huettner, Franziska
    Pacheco, Paul E.
    Doubet, Jamie L.
    Ryan, Michael J.
    Dynda, Danuta I.
    Crawford, David L.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 15 (07) : 1195 - 1204
  • [7] Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery—where are we going?
    Mushegh A. Sahakyan
    Knut Jørgen Labori
    Florian Primavesi
    Kjetil Søreide
    Stefan Stättner
    Bjørn Edwin
    European Surgery, 2019, 51 : 98 - 104
  • [8] Minimally invasive colectomies can be performed with similar outcomes to open counterparts for colorectal cancer emergencies: a propensity score matching analysis utilizing ACS-NSQIP
    Chang, J.
    Assouline, E.
    Calugaru, K.
    Gajic, Z. Z.
    Dogru, V.
    Ray, J. J.
    Erkan, A.
    Esen, E.
    Grieco, M.
    Remzi, F.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (11) : 1065 - 1071
  • [9] Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement-where are we?
    Arora, Sameer
    Vavalle, John P.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (05) : E514 - E518
  • [10] One Hundred and Two Consecutive Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Colectomies—An Outcome and Technical Update
    Franziska Huettner
    Paul E. Pacheco
    Jamie L. Doubet
    Michael J. Ryan
    Danuta I. Dynda
    David L. Crawford
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2011, 15 : 1195 - 1204