Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: Review and Recent Updates

被引:0
|
作者
Saggu, Jay S. [1 ]
Seelhammer, Troy G. [2 ]
Esmaeilzadeh, Sarvie [2 ]
Roberts, John A. [1 ]
Radosevich, Misty A. [2 ]
Ripoll, Juan G. [2 ]
Soto, Juan C. Diaz [2 ]
Wieruszewski, Patrick M. [2 ]
Bohman, J. Kyle K. [2 ]
Wittwer, Erica [2 ]
Archie, Chinyere [1 ]
Nemani, Lakshmi [2 ]
Nabzdyk, Christoph G. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Key Words; cardiogenic shock; acute myocardial infarction; mechanical circulatory support; microaxial flow pump; venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxy- genation; ventricular assist device; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; IMPROVE SURVIVAL; HEART-FAILURE; COUNTERPULSATION; THROMBOLYSIS; TRANSFUSION; IMPELLA;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Cardiogenic shock (CS) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by systemic hypoperfusion that can quickly progress to multiorgan failure and death. Various devices and configurations of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) exist to support patients, each with unique pathophysiological characteristics. The Intra-aortic balloon pump can improve coronary perfusion, decrease afterload, and indirectly augment cardiac output. TandemHeart, a percutaneous ventricular assist device, can decrease left ventricular preload and directly augment cardiac output. Neither the intra-aortic balloon pump nor the percutaneous ventricular assist device has been shown to decrease mortality in the revascularization era. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can offer complete cardiopulmonary support; however, it has not been shown to decrease mortality. Recent studies have indicated that microaxial flow pumps, such as Abiomed's Impella family of devices, can decrease mortality in the AMI-CS population. Managing AMI-CS requires careful clinical assessment, as no single MCS device is universally effective, and device-related complications are common. While venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides complete support, it has not demonstrated a mortality benefit in major trials and carries significant risks. In contrast, microaxial flow pumps have shown a mortality benefit but with higher complication rates. Ongoing research and advancements aim to refine MCS strategies, improve device safety, and enhance patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1066
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock post-acute myocardial infarction - a decade of lessons
    Singh, Sanjeet Singh Avtaar
    Das De, Sudeep
    Nappi, Francesco
    Al-Adhami, Ahmed
    Hegazy, Yasser
    Dalzell, Jonathan
    Doshi, Harikrishna
    Sinclair, Andrew
    Curry, Philip
    Petrie, Mark
    Berry, Colin
    Al-Attar, Nawwar
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 (02) : 542 - 548
  • [42] Peripartum Cardiogenic Shock and Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Botti, Giulia
    Thirunavukarasu, Sharmaine
    Ziviello, Francesca
    Chieffo, Alaide
    INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY-REVIEWS RESEARCH RESOURCES, 2023, 18
  • [43] Mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock
    Rab, Tanveer
    O'Neill, William
    TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2019, 29 (07) : 410 - 417
  • [44] Temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Obradovic, Danilo
    Freund, Anne
    Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
    Sulimov, Dmitry
    Loncar, Goran
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Desch, Steffen
    Thiele, Holger
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 69 : 35 - 46
  • [45] Early vs. delayed mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock
    Buda, Kevin G.
    Hryniewicz, Katarzyna
    Eckman, Peter M.
    Basir, Mir B.
    Cowger, Jennifer A.
    Alaswad, Khaldoon
    Mukundan, Srini
    Sandoval, Yader
    Elliott, Andrea
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Megaly, Michael S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2024, 13 (05) : 390 - 397
  • [46] Advances in temporary mechanical support for treatment of cardiogenic shock
    Koprivanac, Marijan
    Kelava, Marta
    Soltesz, Edward
    Smedira, Nicholas
    Kapadia, Samir
    Brzezinski, Anna
    Alansari, Shehab
    Moazami, Nader
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (06) : 689 - 702
  • [47] Gender Disparities on the Use and Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Diaz-Arocutipa, Carlos
    Gamarra-Valverde, Norma Nicole
    Salguero, Rafael
    Martin-Asenjo, Roberto
    Vicent, Lourdes
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 233 : 65 - 73
  • [48] Racial Disparities in the Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock
    Vojjini, Rahul
    Patlolla, Sri Harsha
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Kumar, Arnav
    Sundaragiri, Pranathi R.
    Doshi, Rajkumar P.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Barsness, Gregory W.
    Holmes, David R.
    Rab, S. Tanveer
    Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (07)
  • [49] Hospital market concentration and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Adam S. Vohra
    Sun-Joo Jang
    Dmitriy N. Feldman
    Parag Goyal
    Udhay Krishnan
    Christopher Sciria
    Jim W. Cheung
    Luke K. Kim
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [50] Hospital market concentration and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Vohra, Adam S.
    Jang, Sun-Joo
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    Goyal, Parag
    Krishnan, Udhay
    Sciria, Christopher
    Cheung, Jim W.
    Kim, Luke K.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)