Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: Review and Recent Updates

被引:0
|
作者
Saggu, Jay S. [1 ]
Seelhammer, Troy G. [2 ]
Esmaeilzadeh, Sarvie [2 ]
Roberts, John A. [1 ]
Radosevich, Misty A. [2 ]
Ripoll, Juan G. [2 ]
Soto, Juan C. Diaz [2 ]
Wieruszewski, Patrick M. [2 ]
Bohman, J. Kyle K. [2 ]
Wittwer, Erica [2 ]
Archie, Chinyere [1 ]
Nemani, Lakshmi [2 ]
Nabzdyk, Christoph G. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Key Words; cardiogenic shock; acute myocardial infarction; mechanical circulatory support; microaxial flow pump; venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxy- genation; ventricular assist device; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; IMPROVE SURVIVAL; HEART-FAILURE; COUNTERPULSATION; THROMBOLYSIS; TRANSFUSION; IMPELLA;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Cardiogenic shock (CS) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by systemic hypoperfusion that can quickly progress to multiorgan failure and death. Various devices and configurations of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) exist to support patients, each with unique pathophysiological characteristics. The Intra-aortic balloon pump can improve coronary perfusion, decrease afterload, and indirectly augment cardiac output. TandemHeart, a percutaneous ventricular assist device, can decrease left ventricular preload and directly augment cardiac output. Neither the intra-aortic balloon pump nor the percutaneous ventricular assist device has been shown to decrease mortality in the revascularization era. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can offer complete cardiopulmonary support; however, it has not been shown to decrease mortality. Recent studies have indicated that microaxial flow pumps, such as Abiomed's Impella family of devices, can decrease mortality in the AMI-CS population. Managing AMI-CS requires careful clinical assessment, as no single MCS device is universally effective, and device-related complications are common. While venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides complete support, it has not demonstrated a mortality benefit in major trials and carries significant risks. In contrast, microaxial flow pumps have shown a mortality benefit but with higher complication rates. Ongoing research and advancements aim to refine MCS strategies, improve device safety, and enhance patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1066
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Werdan, Karl
    Gielen, Stephan
    Ebelt, Henning
    Hochman, Judith S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03) : 156 - +
  • [22] Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Cardiogenic Shock
    Ryan, Matt
    Briceno, Natalia
    Perera, Divaka
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2019, 49 (03) : 197 - 213
  • [23] Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock
    Miller, P. Elliott
    Solomon, Michael A.
    McAreavey, Dorothea
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (11) : 1922 - 1929
  • [24] Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A review
    Shah, Ashish H.
    Puri, Rishi
    Kalra, Ankur
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (04) : 484 - 493
  • [25] Mortality in cardiogenic shock patients receiving mechanical circulatory support: a network meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qun
    Han, Yu
    Sun, Shukun
    Zhang, Chuanxin
    Liu, Han
    Wang, Bailu
    Wei, Shujian
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [26] Clinical Review of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction - Revascularization, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Beyond -
    Saito, Yuichi
    Tateishi, Kazuya
    Kobayashi, Yoshio
    CIRCULATION REPORTS, 2025, 7 (01) : 6 - 14
  • [27] Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock after Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Freitas, Humberto F. G.
    Falcao, Breno A. A.
    Silva, Rafael C.
    Ribeiro, Jamil C.
    Velloso, Luiz Guilherme C.
    de Brito Junior, Fabio Sandoli
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2012, 98 (06) : E96 - E98
  • [28] Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
    Asleh, Rabea
    Resar, Jon R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (08)
  • [29] Acute Biventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock
    Kuchibhotla, Sudeep
    Esposito, Michele L.
    Breton, Catalina
    Pedicini, Robert
    Mullin, Andrew
    O'Kelly, Ryan
    Anderson, Mark
    Morris, Dennis L.
    Batsides, George
    Ramzy, Danny
    Grise, Mark
    Duc Thinh Pham
    Kapur, Navin K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (10):
  • [30] Which mechanical circulatory support device in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock?
    Vergallo, Rocco
    Pedicino, Daniela
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (39) : 3822 - 3823