Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: Review and Recent Updates

被引:0
|
作者
Saggu, Jay S. [1 ]
Seelhammer, Troy G. [2 ]
Esmaeilzadeh, Sarvie [2 ]
Roberts, John A. [1 ]
Radosevich, Misty A. [2 ]
Ripoll, Juan G. [2 ]
Soto, Juan C. Diaz [2 ]
Wieruszewski, Patrick M. [2 ]
Bohman, J. Kyle K. [2 ]
Wittwer, Erica [2 ]
Archie, Chinyere [1 ]
Nemani, Lakshmi [2 ]
Nabzdyk, Christoph G. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Key Words; cardiogenic shock; acute myocardial infarction; mechanical circulatory support; microaxial flow pump; venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxy- genation; ventricular assist device; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; IMPROVE SURVIVAL; HEART-FAILURE; COUNTERPULSATION; THROMBOLYSIS; TRANSFUSION; IMPELLA;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Cardiogenic shock (CS) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by systemic hypoperfusion that can quickly progress to multiorgan failure and death. Various devices and configurations of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) exist to support patients, each with unique pathophysiological characteristics. The Intra-aortic balloon pump can improve coronary perfusion, decrease afterload, and indirectly augment cardiac output. TandemHeart, a percutaneous ventricular assist device, can decrease left ventricular preload and directly augment cardiac output. Neither the intra-aortic balloon pump nor the percutaneous ventricular assist device has been shown to decrease mortality in the revascularization era. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can offer complete cardiopulmonary support; however, it has not been shown to decrease mortality. Recent studies have indicated that microaxial flow pumps, such as Abiomed's Impella family of devices, can decrease mortality in the AMI-CS population. Managing AMI-CS requires careful clinical assessment, as no single MCS device is universally effective, and device-related complications are common. While venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides complete support, it has not demonstrated a mortality benefit in major trials and carries significant risks. In contrast, microaxial flow pumps have shown a mortality benefit but with higher complication rates. Ongoing research and advancements aim to refine MCS strategies, improve device safety, and enhance patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1066
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction-A Review
    Bruoha, Sharon
    Yosefy, Chaim
    Taha, Louay
    Dvir, Danny
    Shuvy, Mony
    Jubeh, Rami
    Carasso, Shemy
    Glikson, Michael
    Asher, Elad
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (17)
  • [2] Acute mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock in India
    Singhvi, Aditi
    Punnen, Julius
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 39 (SUPPL 1) : 47 - 62
  • [3] Outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Kim, Yeunjung
    Shapero, Kayle
    Ahn, Shawn S.
    Goldsweig, Andrew M.
    Desai, Nihar
    Altin, S. Elissa
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, : 658 - 663
  • [4] Mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Challenges and importance of randomized control trials
    Basir, Mir B.
    Pinto, Duane S.
    Ziaeian, Boback
    Khandelwal, Akshay
    Cowger, Jennifer
    Suh, William
    Althouse, Andrew
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 98 (07) : 1264 - 1274
  • [5] Clinical review: mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction
    Cove, Matthew E.
    MacLaren, Graeme
    CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 14 (05):
  • [6] Mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Al-atta, Ayman
    Zaidan, Mohammad
    Abdalwahab, Ahmed
    Asswad, Amjad Ghazal
    Egred, Mohaned
    Zaman, Azfar
    Alkhalil, Mohammad
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (02)
  • [7] Important role of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Truby, Lauren
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Kalesan, Bindu
    Ota, Takeyoshi
    Kirtane, Ajay J.
    Kodali, Susheel
    Nikic, Natasha
    Mundy, Lily
    Colombo, Paolo
    Jorde, Ulrich P.
    Takayama, Hiroo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 48 (02) : 322 - 328
  • [8] Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock
    Mandawat, Aditya
    Rao, Sunil V.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (05)
  • [9] Mechanical circulatory support in the treatment of cardiogenic shock
    Fernando, Shannon M.
    Price, Susanna
    Mathew, Rebecca
    Slutsky, Arthur S.
    Combes, Alain
    Brodie, Daniel
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 28 (04) : 434 - 441
  • [10] Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Following an Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
    Caceres, Manuel
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Moriguchi, Jaime D.
    Arabia, Francisco A.
    Czer, Lawrence S.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2014, 29 (05) : 743 - 751