A Comparative Seismic Study of Wrap-Faced Retaining Wall Embankment Using Sands of Bangladesh

被引:0
|
作者
Ripon Hore [1 ]
Md. Zakir Hossain [2 ]
Shoma Hore [2 ]
Mosharof Al Alim [3 ]
Riad Arefin [4 ]
Mehedi A. Ansary [5 ]
机构
[1] LGED,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology,undefined
[3] Local Government Engineering Department (LGED),undefined
[4] Rajshahi University,undefined
[5] Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology,undefined
关键词
Retaining wall; Acceleration amplification; Kobe earthquake; Wrap-around;
D O I
10.1007/s40996-024-01600-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Wrap-faced Sand Reinforced Retaining Wall (WSRW) Model is a worthwhile method that has been used worldwide for studying the seismic performance and successful implementation to fix the erosion problems in low-lying areas for earthquake resiliency purposes. In this research, a holistic WSRW model was built to compute its response under three different earthquake loading conditions namely˗ Kobe, Loma and Koaecli. The model was implemented using a shake table at the laboratory of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). Several parameters were utilized. Such as, base acceleration (0.1 g, 0.15 g, 0.2 g), relative density (For Sylhet sand relative density of 48%, 64% and 80%, and for local sand relative density of 26%, 45% and 57%), surcharge (0.7 kPa, 1.12 kPa and 1.72 kPa). It was observed that, strain, face displacement and acceleration amplifications were decreased at higher relative density and surcharge pressure but were increased with high base accelerations. For instance, for a Sylhet sand sample with 48% relative density under the Kobe earthquake testing, acceleration amplifications for base accelerations of 0.1 g and 0.15 g are, respectively, 6.5% and 2.7% less than base accelerations of 0.2 g at normalized elevation 0.5 using a surcharge pressure of 0.7 kPa. However, at normalized elevation 0.5 for the Local sand sample with 26% relative density under Kobe earthquake testing employing the same surcharge pressure, acceleration amplification of 0.1 g and base acceleration of 0.15 g are respectively 10.6% and 7.7% less than base acceleration test for 0.2 g. Another result from the experiment of the Loma earthquake with a surcharge load of 0.7 kPa and 0.1 g base acceleration of Sylhet sand reveals that sample with 80% face displacements as well as relative density of 64% are respectively 12.9% and 8.2% less than the sample with relative density of 48% at normalized elevation 0.625. For similar base acceleration and similar surcharge load Local sand model experiments, samples with face displacements of 57% and relative density of 45% are respectively 14.2% and 8.5% less than the samples with relative density of 26% which is observed at normalized elevation 0.625. In the case of the local sand model, at normalized elevation 0.5, samples having the similar base acceleration and surcharge load, strains of a relative density of 57% and 45% are respectively 10% and 5.1% less than the sample having a relative density of 26%. Seismic characteristics observed from this research are beneficial for not only the design but also construction of WSRW.
引用
收藏
页码:2857 / 2881
页数:24
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Earthquake response of wrap faced embankment on soft clay soil in Bangladesh
    Hore, Ripon
    Chakraborty, Sudipta
    Kamrul, Kamruzzaman
    Shuvon, Ayaz Mahmud
    Ansary, Mehedi A.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2023, 22 (03) : 703 - 718
  • [2] Earthquake response of wrap faced embankment on soft clay soil in Bangladesh
    Ripon Hore
    Sudipta Chakraborty
    Kamruzzaman Kamrul
    Ayaz Mahmud Shuvon
    Mehedi A. Ansary
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2023, 22 : 703 - 718
  • [3] Parametric and Comparative Study of a Flexible Retaining Wall
    Chogueur, Aissa
    Abdeldjalil, Zadjaoui
    Reiffsteck, Philippe
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 62 (02): : 295 - 307
  • [4] Experimental study on seismic response of soilbags-built retaining wall
    Liu, Si-Hong
    Jia, Fan
    Chen, Xiao-Lin
    Li, Ling-Jun
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2020, 48 (05) : 603 - 613
  • [5] Seismic Active Thrust on Rigid Retaining Wall Using Strain Dependent Dynamic Properties
    Pain, Anindya
    Annapareddy, V. S. Ramakrishna
    Nimbalkar, Sanjay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2018, 18 (12)
  • [6] Study on the applicability of a retaining wall using batter piles in clay
    Seo, Minsu
    Im, Jong-Chul
    Kim, Changyoung
    Yoo, Jae-Won
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 53 (08) : 1195 - 1212
  • [7] Generalized Seismic Active Thrust on a Retaining Wall with Submerged Backfill Using a Modified Pseudodynamic Method
    Rajesh, B. Giridhar
    Choudhury, Deepankar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2017, 17 (03)
  • [8] Multi-objective optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall: a comparative study
    Ali R. Kashani
    Amir H. Gandomi
    Koorosh Azizi
    Charles V. Camp
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2022, 65
  • [9] Life cycle assessment (LCA) of MSE wall vis-à-vis conventional retaining wall: a comparative study
    Gupta, A. K.
    Kumar, G. S.
    Alla, V.
    Behera, R. N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (12) : 8141 - 8156
  • [10] Multi-objective optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall: a comparative study
    Kashani, Ali R.
    Gandomi, Amir H.
    Azizi, Koorosh
    Camp, Charles, V
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 65 (09)