Measuring the quality of collaborative group engagement: Development and validation of the QCGE self-assessment scale (QCGE-SAS)

被引:0
作者
Jeitziner, Loris T. [1 ,3 ]
Paneth, Lisa [1 ,3 ]
Rack, Oliver [1 ]
Bleisch, Susanne [2 ]
Zahn, Carmen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Sch Appl Psychol, Olten, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Sch Architecture Civil Engn & Geomat, Muttenz, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel, Fac Psychol, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Quality of collaborative group engagement; Self-assessment scale; Subjective measure; Collaborative learning; Higher education; MUTUAL ENGAGEMENT; WORK ENGAGEMENT; STUDENTS; METACOGNITION; ACHIEVEMENT; VALIDITY; ORIENTATIONS; RELIABILITY; CONSTRUCT; STATE;
D O I
10.1007/s11412-025-09445-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Quality of collaborative group engagement (QCGE) is conceptualised as a complex, shared, and multidimensional construct critical to learning outcomes in collaborative learning. It is currently measured in a variety of ways, including rich observation-based methods. However, a standardised self-assessment method for the construct of QCGE has not yet been developed. This contribution presents a pragmatic self-assessment approach to QCGE for higher education contexts and a new self-assessment scale: the QCGE-SAS. Our findings from a study with N = 246 students support the four-factor structure of QCGE originally proposed by Sinha et al. (2015), namely behavioural, social, cognitive, and conceptual-to-consequential collaborative group engagement, and demonstrate that the QCGE-SAS can successfully capture the multidimensional nature of QCGE. Construct and criterion validity were supported by significant correlations with related scales and with self-reported and objective learning outcomes. However, while three subscales proved reliable, the social engagement dimension subscale showed unsatisfactory reliability, indicating further refinement of the scale in future research. Overall, our findings contribute to an accurate operationalisation of the QCGE construct and complement existing methods and comprehensive multi-method approaches to measuring QCGE, thereby informing CSCL research and practice.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Ainsworth S. E., 2021, International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, V19
[2]  
Axelson R. D., 2010, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, V43, P38, DOI [10.1080/00091383.2011.533096, DOI 10.1080/00091383.2011.533096]
[3]  
Beckhard R., 1972, J CONTEMP BUS, V1, P23
[4]   PRACTICAL ISSUES IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
CHOU, CP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1987, 16 (01) :78-117
[5]   Group metacognition in online collaborative learning: validity and reliability of the group metacognition scale (GMS) [J].
Biasutti, Michele ;
Frate, Sara .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 66 (06) :1321-1338
[6]   The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module [J].
Biasutti, Michele .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2011, 57 (03) :1865-1875
[7]  
Bojanova Irena, 2013, 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), P239, DOI 10.1109/FIE.2013.6684825
[8]   Mutual engagement and collocation with shared representations [J].
Bryan-Kinns, Nick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2013, 71 (01) :76-90
[9]   Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions [J].
Buder, Juergen .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (03) :1114-1117
[10]   Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model [J].
Burke, C. Shawn ;
Stagl, Kevin C. ;
Salas, Eduardo ;
Pierce, Linda ;
Kendall, Dana .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1189-1207