Green public procurement, external pressures and enterprise green transition: Evidence from China

被引:0
作者
Gao, Jinqi [1 ]
Lu, Fan [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance & Taxat, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Green Public Procurement; Green Transition; Spillover Effects; Policy Synergy; ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION; RESOURCE DEPLETION; TRANSFORMATION; CHALLENGES; POLICY; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.asieco.2025.101936
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Green Public Procurement (GPP) is an essential fiscal policy instrument in China's environmental governance framework. This paper examines the effect of GPP on the green transition of enterprises by using China's Green Public Procurement Data from 2015 to 2022. GPP significantly contributes to the green transition. From the perspective of external pressure, GPP enhances both government oversight and social supervision. This positive incentive effect is more significant in public bidding, heavily polluting industries and regions with higher intellectual property protection. Further analysis reveals that GPP exhibits both industry and regional spillover effects on enterprise green transition, though the spillover effects along supply chains are insignificant. Additionally, the study finds evidence of a synergistic effect between GPP and tax incentives in promoting green transition. The research provides new insights for promoting green transition and upgrading enterprises in practice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Strategic use of green public procurement in the bus sector: Challenges and opportunities
    Aldenius, Malin
    Khan, Jamil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 250 - 257
  • [2] Innovation on demand-Can public procurement drive market success of innovations?
    Aschhoff, Birgit
    Sofka, Wolfgang
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (08) : 1235 - 1247
  • [3] Buyer-supplier relationships and the stakeholder theory of capital structure
    Banerjee, Shantanu
    Dasgupta, Sudipto
    Kim, Yungsan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (05) : 2507 - 2552
  • [4] Baron R., 2016, 33 ROUND TABLE SUSTA
  • [5] Bauer B., 2009, Benefits of Green Public Procurement
  • [6] Relationship between green public procurement criteria and sustainability assessment tools applied to office buildings
    Braulio-Gonzalo, Marta
    Bovea, Maria D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 81
  • [7] Green Public Procurement of Certified Wood: Spatial Leverage Effect and Welfare Implications
    Brusselaers, Jan
    Van Huylenbroeck, Guido
    Buysse, Jeroen
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 135 : 91 - 102
  • [8] Government Engagement, Environmental Policy, and Environmental Performance: Evidence from the Most Polluting Chinese Listed Firms
    Chang, Li
    Li, Wenjing
    Lu, Xiaoyan
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 24 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [9] ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION, RESOURCE DEPLETION, AND THE SUSTAINABILITY OF DEVELOPING-COUNTRY AGRICULTURE
    CHAPMAN, D
    BARKER, R
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1991, 39 (04) : 723 - 737
  • [10] Does green transformation trigger green premiums? Evidence from Chinese listed manufacturing firms
    Chen, Yuzhen
    Ma, Xiaojun
    Ma, Xuejiao
    Shen, Meichen
    Chen, Jingquan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 407