Coverage and connectivity maximization for wireless sensor networks using improved chaotic grey wolf optimization

被引:3
作者
Shaikh, Muhammad Suhail [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chang [1 ]
Xie, Senlin [1 ]
Zheng, Gengzhong [1 ]
Dong, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Qiu, Shuwei [2 ]
Ahmad, Mohd Ashraf [3 ]
Raj, Saurav [4 ]
机构
[1] Hanshan Normal Univ, Sch Phys & Elect Engn, Chaozhou 521000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Hanshan Normal Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Engn, Chaozhou 521000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, Fac Elect & Elect Engn Technol, Pekan 26600, Pahang, Malaysia
[4] Inst Chem Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Marathwada Campus, Jalna, India
关键词
CEC_22; Chaotic map; Connectivity; Coverage; Improved grey Wolf; Optimization; Wireless sensor network;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-00184-2
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Efficient network coverage and connectivity in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is critical for modern data-driven applications requiring seamless data collection and transmission. One of the key challenges is the optimal placement of sensor nodes, which directly impacts network performance and deployment costs. This study presents an Improved Chaotic Grey Wolf Optimization (ICGWO) algorithm to enhance WSN coverage and connectivity while addressing challenges like high deployment costs, limited coverage, and insufficient connectivity. A mathematical model for the WSN coverage and connectivity optimization problem is developed as the foundation. The Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) is enhanced using a chaotic map, improving its ability to find the best solutions and achieve faster convergence, resulting in the ICGWO algorithm. The performance of ICGWO is evaluated using CEC_22 benchmark functions and compared with other optimization methods, demonstrating clear improvements in efficiency. In practical applications, the proposed ICGWO obtained superior results for sensor node placement. For example, with 20 sensor nodes in Case 1, the coverage rate reaches 95.9077%, while for 30 nodes in Case 2, it achieves 98.2211%. Similarly, in Case 3, with 40 sensor nodes, the coverage rate is 91.6875%, and in Case 4, with 50 sensor nodes, it is 99.4940%. In addition, in Case 5 and Case 6, with 60 and 70 sensor nodes, the coverage rates are 99.7801% and 99.7822%, respectively. These outcomes reflect average improvements of 16.41%, 5.36%, 3.45%,2.371%,2.80%, and 2.18%, respectively, compared to other state-of-the-art methods. These metrics emphasize the effectiveness of ICGWO in maximizing network coverage and connectivity. The findings confirm that ICGWO efficiently improves the coverage and connectivity, making it a reliable solution for addressing deployment challenges in diverse scenarios. By maximizing the coverage and connectivity, ICGWO significantly contributes to the advancement of WSN technology.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   A Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer Based Data Clustering Algorithm [J].
Ahmadi, Ramin ;
Ekbatanifard, Gholamhossein ;
Bayat, Peyman .
APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 (01) :63-79
[2]   A Bioinspired Method for Optimal Task Scheduling in Fog-Cloud Environment [J].
Anka, Ferzat ;
Tejani, Ghanshyam G. ;
Sharma, Sunil Kumar ;
Baljon, Mohammed .
CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2025, :2691-2724
[3]   Swarm optimization for Imaging of corrosion by impedance measurements in eddy current test [J].
Cacciola, M. ;
Calcagno, S. ;
Morabito, F. C. ;
Versaci, M. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2007, 43 (04) :1853-1856
[4]   An Energy-Saving and Efficient Deployment Strategy for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Improved Seagull Optimization Algorithm [J].
Cao, Li ;
Wang, Zihui ;
Wang, Zihao ;
Wang, Xiangkun ;
Yue, Yinggao .
BIOMIMETICS, 2023, 8 (02)
[5]   Swarm Intelligence-Based Performance Optimization for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks: Survey, Challenges, and Future Directions [J].
Cao, Li ;
Cai, Yong ;
Yue, Yinggao .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :161524-161553
[6]   Balancing the trade-off between cost and reliability for wireless sensor networks: a multi-objective optimized deployment method [J].
Chen, Long ;
Xu, Yingying ;
Xu, Fangyi ;
Hu, Qian ;
Tang, Zhenzhou .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 53 (08) :9148-9173
[7]  
Cheng Jiahao, 2023, 2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Power, Electronics and Computer Applications (ICPECA), P1109, DOI 10.1109/ICPECA56706.2023.10076217
[8]   Data fusion based coverage optimization in heterogeneous sensor networks: A survey [J].
Deng, Xianjun ;
Jiang, Yalan ;
Yang, Laurence T. ;
Lin, Man ;
Yi, Lingzhi ;
Wang, Minghua .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2019, 52 :90-105
[9]   GWO-SMSLO: Grey wolf optimization based clustering with secured modified Sea Lion optimization routing algorithm in wireless sensor networks [J].
Dinesh, K. ;
Svn, Santhosh Kumar .
PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 17 (02) :585-611
[10]   Energy-efficient trust-aware secured neuro-fuzzy clustering with sparrow search optimization in wireless sensor network [J].
Dinesh, K. ;
Santhosh Kumar, S. V. N. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SECURITY, 2024, 23 (01) :199-223