Cesarean section diverticulum area predicting the intraoperative hemorrhage at suction curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy after focused ultrasound ablation surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Jun-rong [1 ]
Sun, Li-ya [1 ]
Tang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Ming-bo [1 ]
Yang, Ming-tao [1 ]
Xu, Fan [1 ]
Shi, Qiuling [2 ]
Hu, Hui-quan [1 ]
机构
[1] Affiliated Nanchong Cent Hosp, North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Coll Biomed Engn, State Key Lab Ultrasound Med & Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Cesarean section diverticulum; cesarean scar pregnancy; intraoperative massive hemorrhage; prognosis; suction curettage; focused ultrasound ablation surgery; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/02656736.2025.2468757
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate the significance of the cesarean section diverticulum (CSD) area for predicting the intraoperative massive hemorrhage during suction curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS). Methods Data from 90 patients undergoing suction curettage after FUAS were collected. According to their intraoperative bleeding volume, patients were categorized into three groups: Group 1 (n = 71, <200 mL), Group 2 (n = 9, 200-300 mL) and Group 3 (n = 10, >= 300 mL). Multiple liner regression analysis was performed to identify the influencing factors for CSD area and intraoperative blood loss. The ROC curve was plotted to identify the optimal cutoff values. Results The median CSD area size in Group 3 (336.8 mm(2)) was significantly greater than in Groups 1 (128.6 mm(2)) and 2 (121.6 mm(2)) (p < .05). Using multiple linear regression analysis, CSD area was associated with intraoperative blood loss (p < .05). The optimal cutoff CSD areas for predicting intraoperative massive hemorrhage volumes >= 200 mL and >= 300 mL were 202.05 mm(2) and 241.90 mm(2), respectively. The mean gestational sac diameter and preoperative symptoms (+) were positively related to CSD area, while residual myometrial thickness was negatively correlated with the CSD area. CSD area showed the greatest relationship to sonication time (r(s) = 0.42), treatment time (r(s) = 0.316) and total energy used for ablation (r(s) = 0.415). Conclusion The preoperative CSD area could predict intraoperative massive hemorrhage during suction curettage after FUAS, which might inform therapy strategies for CSP patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Focused Ultrasound Ablation Surgery combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage in the treatment and management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
    Yuan, Yuan
    Pu, Dali
    Zhan, Ping
    Zheng, Yongping
    Ren, Qianchuan
    Teichmann, Alexander T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 258 : 168 - 173
  • [2] Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy
    Mu, Lin
    Weng, Huifang
    Wang, Xiaoyun
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (03) : 769 - 777
  • [3] A novel scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage following focused ultrasound ablation surgery in patients with type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy
    Yang, Jing
    Luo, Xiaomei
    Guo, Litong
    Cheng, Hui
    Tang, Yi
    Song, Yiqin
    Li, Wei
    Xiong, Li
    Gao, Fang
    Cheng, Wei
    Zhu, Qiaoling
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2025, 42 (01)
  • [4] The value of ultrasound parameters in predicting the efficacy of transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy
    Zhou, Chunqiao
    Li, Xinyan
    Mo, Yu'ning
    Wei, Fangtao
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2024, 50 (06) : 948 - 954
  • [5] Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy
    Lin Mu
    Huifang Weng
    Xiaoyun Wang
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 769 - 777
  • [6] Is preprocessing helpful for suction and curettage in treating cesarean scar pregnancy?
    Huang, J. R.
    Lie, X.
    Fu, C.
    Deng, Y. H.
    Gao, T.
    Zhang, H. W.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 47 (06) : 900 - 905
  • [7] Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage
    Jurkovic, D.
    Knez, J.
    Appiah, A.
    Farahani, L.
    Mavrelos, D.
    Ross, J. A.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 47 (04) : 511 - 517
  • [8] The value of cesarean scar diverticulum in diagnosis of adverse events during dilatation and curettage in patient with cesarean scar pregnancy
    Yang, Fengleng
    Zhang, Qian
    Shuai, Yongzhong
    Wang, Zhigang
    Jing, Huaibo
    Wang, Xiaodan
    Deng, Chen
    Lin, Fanyu
    Lai, Hua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2025, 168 (02) : 525 - 534
  • [9] Comparison of two different suction curettage methods in cesarean scar pregnancy treatment
    Elmas, Burak
    Ozturk, Neslihan
    Kizil, Emine
    Koc, Bergen Laleli
    Zorlu, Ugurcan
    Ersak, Duygu Tugrul
    Aktas, Turkan Dikici
    Erten, Asuman
    Erkaya, Salim
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [10] High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with dilatation and curettage for Cesarean scar pregnancy
    Huang, L.
    Du, Y.
    Zhao, C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 43 (01) : 98 - 101