A bi-objective optimisation model for the drone scheduling problem in island delivery

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Ying [1 ]
Liu, Jiaxin [2 ]
Wang, Shuaian [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Logist & Maritime Studies, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Shenzhen Int Grad Sch, Dept Logist & Transportat, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
Island delivery; drone scheduling problem; bi-objective optimisation model; energy consumption; non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II; augmented epsilon-constraint; VEHICLE-ROUTING PROBLEM; TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM; EPSILON-CONSTRAINT METHOD; NSGA-II; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2025.2496965
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Drone-assisted parcel delivery to remote islands is increasingly replacing traditional methods, offering improved efficiency and enhanced service reliability. This paper addresses the drone scheduling problem in island delivery (DSP-ID) by optimising drone delivery routes. In particular, we first introduce a bi-objective mixed-integer linear programming model that concurrently optimises delivery time and energy consumption. To address the model, both a heuristic non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) and an exact augmented epsilon-constraint method are developed. The efficacy and robustness of the proposed model and algorithms are evaluated through experiments across various scales. Results indicate that both algorithms yield high-quality solutions for DSP-ID in small-scale scenarios. However, as the problem size expands, the performance of the augmented epsilon-constraint method wanes under time constraints, whereas the NSGA-II consistently delivers high-quality solutions. Additionally, we provide decision-makers with actionable insights for selecting the most effective drone delivery routes.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A stochastic bi-objective project scheduling model under failure of activities
    Rezaei, Fatemeh
    Najafi, Amir Abbas
    Demeulemeester, Erik
    Ramezanian, Reza
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 338 (01) : 453 - 476
  • [32] A bi-objective model for robust yard allocation scheduling for outbound containers
    Liu, Changchun
    Zhang, Canrong
    Zheng, Li
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 49 (01) : 113 - 135
  • [33] Bi-objective orienteering for personal activity scheduling
    Matl, Piotr
    Nolz, Pamela C.
    Ritzinger, Ulrike
    Ruthmair, Mario
    Tricoire, Fabien
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 82 : 69 - 82
  • [34] The bi-objective multimodal car-sharing problem
    Enzi, Miriam
    Parragh, Sophie N.
    Puchinger, Jakob
    OR SPECTRUM, 2022, 44 (02) : 307 - 348
  • [35] A Bi-Objective Model for Multi-Mode Resource Constrained Scheduling Problem to Optimize the Net Present Value of Costs and Makespan
    Bagherinejad, Jafar
    Zare, Farideh
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 18 (03): : 340 - 348
  • [36] The Dynamic Drone Scheduling Delivery Problem
    Campuzano, Giovanni
    Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo
    Mes, Martijn
    COMPUTATIONAL LOGISTICS (ICCL 2022), 2022, 13557 : 260 - 274
  • [37] Multi-objective reinforcement learning for bi-objective time-dependent pickup and delivery problem with late penalties
    Santiyuda, Gemilang
    Wardoyo, Retantyo
    Pulungan, Reza
    Yu, Vincent F.
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 128
  • [38] A bi-objective hybrid vibration damping optimization model for synchronous flow shop scheduling problems
    Tavana, Madjid
    Hajipour, Vahid
    Alaghebandha, Mohammad
    Di Caprio, Debora
    MACHINE LEARNING WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 11
  • [39] A new bi-objective vehicle routing-scheduling problem with cross-docking: Mathematical model and algorithms
    Goodarzi, Asefeh Hasani
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza
    Amini, Alireza
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 149
  • [40] Solving and optimizing a bi-objective open shop scheduling problem by a modified genetic algorithm
    Azadeh, Ali
    Goldansaz, SeyedMorteza
    Zahedi-Anaraki, AmirHossein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8) : 1603 - 1613