The challenges of using social media to recruit participants for research on LGBTQ people and animal companionship

被引:0
作者
Riggs, Damien W. [1 ]
Ciccarello, Claudia [1 ]
Cations, Monica [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Educ Psychol & Social Work, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
LGBTQ; animal companions; social media; online recruitment;
D O I
10.1080/14680777.2025.2483426
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Recruiting participants via social media can seem appealing to researchers with limited funds or access to target populations. Yet such a recruitment strategy can be fraught by bad actors who may engage with social media advertisements in negative ways. In this commentary we share our experience of advertising on Facebook to recruit participants for a study on lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) people and their relationships with animal companions. We experienced a high volume of negative comments made on our advertisement, with people suggesting that our research focused on bestiality, that it was an attempt to "groom" animals, and that our research is a "slippery slope" to other nefarious agendas. We consider what it means for researchers reliant upon algorithms that may place us in harm's way, and we also consider what it means to think about human-animal relationships among LGBTQ people in a social climate that continues to be hostile.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis
    Bhatt, DL
    Steg, PG
    Ohman, EM
    Hirsch, AT
    Ikeda, Y
    Mas, JL
    Goto, S
    Liau, CS
    Richard, AJ
    Röther, J
    Wilson, PWF
    Andersen-Dalheim, H
    Anderson, P
    Anell, B
    Arber, S
    Armstrong, K
    Arnot, D
    Baldam, A
    Barratt, I
    Barresi, S
    Beder, J
    Benson, M
    Bergman, F
    Best, J
    Bhasim, R
    Bovell, G
    Bowman, N
    Brkic, M
    Bromberger, D
    Brown, D
    Brown, J
    Brownstein, M
    Bruce, A
    Buonopane, J
    Burns, S
    Butler, A
    Byrne, D
    Carson, J
    Cassimatis, P
    Chaffey, G
    Chambers, D
    Chan, WJ
    Chan, B
    Cheatham, J
    Chen, R
    Cheong, B
    Cheung, C
    Chin, J
    Chiu, A
    Choo, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (02): : 180 - 189
  • [2] The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms
    Bucher, Taina
    [J]. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2017, 20 (01) : 30 - 44
  • [3] Evans William, 2024, Groomer Discourse: A Transgender-Sensitive Critical Discourse Analysis of Queerphobic Hate Speech on Twitter
  • [4] Huebert David, 2018, Species Panic: Interspecies Erotics in Post-1900 American Literature
  • [5] Ison Jessica., 2021, Gender and Sexuality in Critical Animal Studies, P201
  • [6] Ison Jessica., 2024, Queer and Animal Provocations: Homonormativity, Animal Exploitation, and Sexual Violence
  • [7] Jones Pattrice., 2023, Birds-Eye Views: Queer Queries About Activism, Animals, and Identity
  • [8] The Colonial Project of Gender (and Everything Else)
    O'Sullivan, Sandy
    [J]. GENEALOGY, 2021, 5 (03)
  • [9] Riggs Damien W., 2021, Queer Entanglements: Intersections of Gender, Sexuality, and Animal Companionship
  • [10] Rothstein Melissa, 2012, Unpublished Final Project Report