Family Law for Family Life: Rethinking the Boundaries of Family Law

被引:0
作者
Smith, Leanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Exeter, England
关键词
family law; norms; modalities; family conflict; family life; DIVORCE;
D O I
10.1093/clp/cuaf001
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
A key function of family law is to regulate family breakdown and conflict. Consequently, family law has been characterized as under threat as family disputes have been diverted from courts and lawyers, and its norms have become inaccessible to many. This article questions the scale of the threat. It argues for a rethinking of the boundaries of family law to shift focus away from dispute resolution and towards more constructive and anticipatory approaches. It shows how family law norms and rules might usefully be understood at the beginning of, or during, relationships. As such, the relevance of family law can be recaptured by seeing it as a tool for better informed-and perhaps normatively better-relationships over time; family law can be for family life, as well as family conflict. Finally, the article considers how contemporary shifts in the modalities of family law might be embraced and extended to accommodate a family law for family life agenda.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Reconsidering the "Good Divorce" [J].
Amato, Paul R. ;
Kane, Jennifer B. ;
James, Spencer .
FAMILY RELATIONS, 2011, 60 (05) :511-524
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Re C (Welfare of Child: Immunisation), P1376
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Re H -B (Children)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Re J (Childs' Religious Upbringing and Circumcision)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Re C (Internal Relocation)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Macleod v Macleod
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Legal Support: The Way Ahead. An Action Plan to Deliver Better Support to People Experiencing Legal Problems
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, R (Steinfeld and Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1988, As enshrined in Children Act 1989, s 2(7) and explained in Law Commission, Family Law, Review of Child Law: Guardianship and Custody, pch 2
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Miller v Miller