Clean Energy Stock Market and Energy/Metals as Safe-Haven Assets: New Insights from Quantile-on-Quantile and Markov-Switching Approaches

被引:0
作者
Khallouli, Wajih [1 ]
Smimou, Kamal [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tunis, Higher Sch Econ & Commercial Sci Tunis ESSECT, Dept Econ, Tunis, Tunisia
[2] Ontario Tech Univ, Fac Business & Informat Technol, Dept Finance, Oshawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Clean energy equity market; Commodity futures; Crisis; Quantile-on-quantile; Regime-switching; G10; G11; G12; M54; C50; Q40; DETECTING SHIFT; CRUDE-OIL; BOND; LIQUIDITY; CONTAGION; RETURNS; HEDGE; GOLD; US; EQUILIBRIUM;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-025-10932-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study, we propose a novel methodology for selection of appropriate safe-haven assets to mitigate the risks of investment in clean energy and to enhance returns, especially in times of turbulence. Our methodology is supported by the use of quantile-on-quantile regression to capture the dependence structure between the clean energy equity returns and various potential safe-haven asset candidates, with an emphasis on the technique of Markov-switching regime, which enables separation of common and idiosyncratic shocks allowing an in-depth analysis of safe haven properties according to sources of risk to which the clean energy market is confronted. Our main empirical results show a nonlinear connection between our safe haven candidates and clean energy equity returns during their lowest quantiles. However, for times of turbulent episodes, our evidence (including hedging-effectiveness analysis) shows that only platinum or commodity company stocks can hedge the clean energy equities against common shock such as the COVID-19. Moreover, gold or silver can be efficient hedging instruments for investors in the clean energy market only against idiosyncratic shock.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]   The strategic and tactical value of commodity futures [J].
Erb, CB ;
Harvey, CR .
FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2006, 62 (02) :69-97
[22]   The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence [J].
Fama, EF ;
French, KR .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 18 (03) :25-46
[23]   Choosing factors [J].
Fama, Eugene F. ;
French, Kenneth R. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 128 (02) :234-252
[24]  
Ferrer R, 2019, ECON BULL, V39, P969
[25]  
Flavin T., 2008, EMERG MARK REV, V9, P280, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.EMEMAR.2008.10.002
[26]   DETECTING SHIFT AND PURE CONTAGION IN EAST ASIAN EQUITY MARKETS: A UNIFIED APPROACH [J].
Flavin, Thomas J. ;
Panopoulou, Ekaterini .
PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 15 (03) :401-421
[27]   Identifying safe haven assets for equity investors through an analysis of the stability of shock transmission [J].
Flavina, Thomas J. ;
Morleya, Ciara E. ;
Panopoulou, Ekaterini .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2014, 33 :137-154
[28]   Information and volatility linkages in the stock, bond, and money markets [J].
Fleming, J ;
Kirby, C ;
Ostdiek, B .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 49 (01) :111-137
[29]   Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs [J].
Garleanu, Nicolae ;
Pedersen, Lasse Heje .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (06) :2309-2340
[30]   Portfolio choice and pricing in illiquid markets [J].
Garleanu, Nicolae .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2009, 144 (02) :532-564