Clean Energy Stock Market and Energy/Metals as Safe-Haven Assets: New Insights from Quantile-on-Quantile and Markov-Switching Approaches

被引:0
作者
Khallouli, Wajih [1 ]
Smimou, Kamal [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tunis, Higher Sch Econ & Commercial Sci Tunis ESSECT, Dept Econ, Tunis, Tunisia
[2] Ontario Tech Univ, Fac Business & Informat Technol, Dept Finance, Oshawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Clean energy equity market; Commodity futures; Crisis; Quantile-on-quantile; Regime-switching; G10; G11; G12; M54; C50; Q40; DETECTING SHIFT; CRUDE-OIL; BOND; LIQUIDITY; CONTAGION; RETURNS; HEDGE; GOLD; US; EQUILIBRIUM;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-025-10932-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study, we propose a novel methodology for selection of appropriate safe-haven assets to mitigate the risks of investment in clean energy and to enhance returns, especially in times of turbulence. Our methodology is supported by the use of quantile-on-quantile regression to capture the dependence structure between the clean energy equity returns and various potential safe-haven asset candidates, with an emphasis on the technique of Markov-switching regime, which enables separation of common and idiosyncratic shocks allowing an in-depth analysis of safe haven properties according to sources of risk to which the clean energy market is confronted. Our main empirical results show a nonlinear connection between our safe haven candidates and clean energy equity returns during their lowest quantiles. However, for times of turbulent episodes, our evidence (including hedging-effectiveness analysis) shows that only platinum or commodity company stocks can hedge the clean energy equities against common shock such as the COVID-19. Moreover, gold or silver can be efficient hedging instruments for investors in the clean energy market only against idiosyncratic shock.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Asset pricing with liquidity risk [J].
Acharya, VV ;
Pedersen, LH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (02) :375-410
[2]   Financialization in commodity markets: A passing trend or the new normal? [J].
Adams, Zeno ;
Glueck, Thorsten .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2015, 60 :93-111
[3]   ASSET PRICING AND THE BID ASK SPREAD [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
MENDELSON, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) :223-249
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF BETA, BID-ASK SPREAD, RESIDUAL RISK, AND SIZE ON STOCK RETURNS [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
MENDELSON, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1989, 44 (02) :479-486
[5]   International asset allocation with regime shifts [J].
Ang, A ;
Bekaert, G .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2002, 15 (04) :1137-1187
[6]   The Determinants of Stock and Bond Return Comovements [J].
Baele, Lieven ;
Bekaert, Geert ;
Inghelbrecht, Koen .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2010, 23 (06) :2374-2428
[7]   BIVARIATE GARCH ESTIMATION OF THE OPTIMAL COMMODITY FUTURES HEDGE [J].
BAILLIE, RT ;
MYERS, RJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 1991, 6 (02) :109-124
[8]   Asymmetric Volatility in the Gold Market [J].
Baur, Dirk G. .
JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, 2012, 14 (04) :26-38
[9]   Is Gold a Hedge or a Safe Haven? An Analysis of Stocks, Bonds and Gold [J].
Baur, Dirk G. ;
Lucey, Brian M. .
FINANCIAL REVIEW, 2010, 45 (02) :217-229
[10]   Is gold a safe haven? International evidence [J].
Baur, Dirk G. ;
McDermott, Thomas K. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2010, 34 (08) :1886-1898