Leveraging Citizen Data to Improve Public Services and Measure Progress Toward Sustainable Development Goal 16

被引:0
作者
Fraisl, Dilek [1 ]
Neves, Mariana [1 ]
Seidu, Omar [2 ]
Darpoh, Cyrus Kwesi [2 ]
Basnyat, Aparna [1 ]
Usheva, Fatma [1 ]
Tungbani, Basil [2 ]
Ankamah, Dieudonnee [2 ]
See, Linda [3 ]
Gadgil, Arvinn [1 ]
机构
[1] United Nations Dev Programme Global Policy Ctr Gov, Oslo, Norway
[2] Ghana Stat Serv GSS, Accra, Ghana
[3] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria
关键词
citizen data; citizen science; citizen-generated data; good governance; policy; public services; SDG; 16; sustainable development goals (SDGs); SCIENCE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1002/sd.3441
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of a pilot study conducted in Ghana that utilized citizen data approaches for monitoring a governance indicator within the SDG framework, focusing on indicator 16.6.2 citizen satisfaction with public services. This indicator is a crucial measure of governance quality, as emphasized by the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through target 16.6 Develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels. Indicator 16.6.2 specifically measures satisfaction with key public services, including health, education, and other government services, such as government-issued identification documents through a survey. However, with only 5 years remaining to achieve the SDGs, the lack of data continues to pose a significant challenge in monitoring progress toward this target, particularly regarding the experiences of marginalized populations. Our findings suggest that well-designed citizen data initiatives can effectively capture the experiences of marginalized individuals and communities. Additionally, they can serve as valuable supplements to official statistics, providing crucial data on population groups typically underrepresented in traditional surveys.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Agenda 2063: The Africa we want (Popular version)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Population of Regions and Districts [Internet]
  • [3] Atrostic B.K., 2001, J OFF STAT, V17, P209
  • [4] Beck S., 2024, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, V9, P8, DOI [10.5334/cstp.691, DOI 10.5334/CSTP.691]
  • [5] Benyei P., 2023, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, V8, P21, DOI [10.5334/cstp.514, DOI 10.5334/CSTP.514]
  • [6] Berg N., 2005, Encyclopedia of social measurement, V2, P865, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00038-4, 10.1016/b0-12-369398-5/00038-4]
  • [7] Beullens K, 2018, Survey Methods Insights from the Field, DOI [DOI 10.13094/SMIF-2018-00003, 10.13094/SMIF-2018-00003]
  • [8] Blake C., 2020, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, V5, DOI [DOI 10.5334/CSTP.320, 10.5334/cstp.320]
  • [9] Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding
    Cooper, Caren B.
    Hawn, Chris L.
    Larson, Lincoln R.
    Parrish, Julia K.
    Bowser, Gillian
    Cavalier, Darlene
    Dunn, Robert R.
    Haklay, Mordechai
    Gupta, Kaberi Kar
    Jelks, Na'Taki Osborne
    Johnson, Valerie A.
    Katti, Madhusudan
    Leggett, Zakiya
    Wilson, Omega R.
    Wilson, Sacoby
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 372 (6549) : 1386 - +
  • [10] Czajka J. L., 2015, Declining Response Rates in Federal Surveys: Trends and Implications. Final ReportVolume 1. Mathematica Policy Research.