STEM teachers' perceptions, familiarity, and support needs for integrating generative artificial intelligence in K-12 education

被引:0
作者
Cheah, Yin Hong [1 ]
Kim, Juhee [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Curriculum & Instruction, 875 Perimeter Dr MS 3082, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[2] Univ Idaho, Dept Leadership & Counseling, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
关键词
generative artificial intelligence; STEM teachers; K-12; education; perception; familiarity; support; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/ssm.18334
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We applied a mixed-method survey approach to explore STEM teachers' perceptions, familiarity, and the support needed for integrating generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in K-12 education. The study collected 48 responses from Idaho, USA, predominantly from White, female teachers servicing in rural schools. We analyzed data using both descriptive and inferential statistics, along with thematic and content analysis. The findings revealed diverse perceptions among STEM teachers regarding the impact of GenAI on education, with an almost equal split between those who viewed GenAI positively and those who viewed it negatively. Similarly, teachers' familiarity with GenAI integration varied widely, with over half lacking user experience. A significant positive correlation was found between teachers' perceptions of GenAI and their familiarity with its integration. Despite these varied views, there was a strong consensus among teachers on the importance of equipping students with AI-related knowledge and skills. While professional development was identified as the most crucial support for GenAI integration, STEM teachers pointed to their own resistance and a lack of awareness among school leadership as major challenges to implementing GenAI-focused professional development. The study discussed the implications for developing support systems that can better facilitate STEM teachers' GenAI integration.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Effect of Principal's Technology Leadership on Teacher's Technology Integration
    A'mar, Fadia
    Eleyan, Derar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION, 2022, 15 (01) : 781 - 798
  • [2] In-service teachers' (mis)conceptions of artificial intelligence in K-12 science education
    Abramowitz, Brian
    Antonenko, Pavlo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2023, 55 (01) : 64 - 78
  • [3] Akram B, 2022, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P12681
  • [4] COMPARING TURKISH PRE- SERVICE STEM AND NON-STEM TEACHERS' ATTITUDES AND ANXIETY TOWARD ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Aktulun, Ozgun Uyanik
    Kasapoglu, Koray
    Aydogdu, Bulent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2024, 23 (05): : 950 - 963
  • [5] Alhazzani N. S., 2024, International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, V7, P1614
  • [6] Altan T, 2022, EDUC TECHNOL SOC, V25, P48
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2013, Science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the national interest: A strategic approach
  • [8] [Anonymous], International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, P1
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, Percentage distribution of associate's degrees and bachelor's degrees awarded by degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity and sex: Academic year 2013-14
  • [10] Aoun JE, 2017, ROBOT-PROOF: HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P1