Secondary findings in hereditary cancer genes after germline genetic testing - systematic review of literature

被引:0
|
作者
Avsec, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Blatnik, Ana [1 ,2 ]
Krajc, Mateja [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oncol Ljubljana, Dept Clin Canc Genet, Zaloska 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Korytkova 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; EXOME; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00439-025-02746-w
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In the last decade the increasing use of germline genetic testing has led to frequent discoveries of secondary findings (SF) in hereditary cancer (HC) genes. Disclosure and clinical management of such findings are still not clearly defined and raise many ethical, clinical, and practical questions. This systematic review is focused on frequency of reported SF in HC genes across different populations as well as summarizing current guidelines, recommendations, and actual clinical practice about reporting and managing SF in HC genes. A systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed on the electronic database PubMed from inception to June 2024. 30 research papers involving almost 150,000 patients were reviewed. The reported frequencies of SF in HC genes varied between 0.4 and 3.1%. The majority of patients agreed to receive SF for medically actionable genes. Management and surveillance of patients after disclosure of SF in HC genes were rarely reported, but the limited data show no regret of receiving such results as well as diagnoses of early-stage cancer in patients participating in recommended surveillance programs related to SF. A substantial number of carriers of highly penetrant pathogenic variants in HC genes is discovered by reporting SF after germline genetic testing with next-generation sequencing. Additional information about the impact of SF disclosure on individuals and health care systems is needed to optimize the integration of SF into clinical care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Design of a study to implement population-based risk assessment for hereditary cancer genetic testing in primary care
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Wang, Catharine
    Cole, Allison M.
    Norquist, Barbara M.
    Knerr, Sarah
    Devine, Beth
    Shirts, Brian
    Cain, Kevin
    Harris, Heather M.
    Haile, Helen G.
    Swisher, Elizabeth M.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 101
  • [42] Is there evidence that we should screen the general population for Lynch syndrome with genetic testing? A systematic review
    Prince, Anya E. R.
    Cadigan, R. Jean
    Henderson, Gail E.
    Evans, James P.
    Adams, Michael
    Coker-Schwimmer, Emmanuel
    Penn, Dolly C.
    Van Riper, Marcia
    Corbie-Smith, Giselle
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2017, 10 : 49 - 60
  • [43] A Cross-sectional Study of Regret in Cancer Patients After Sharing Test Results for Pathogenic Germline Variants of Hereditary Cancers With Relatives
    Fukuzaki, Naomi
    Kiyozumi, Yoshimi
    Higashigawa, Satomi
    Horiuchi, Yasue
    Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki
    Nishimura, Seiichiro
    Mori, Keita
    Notsu, Akifumi
    Suishu, Izumi
    Ohnami, Sumiko
    Kusuhara, Masatoshi
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
    Takeda, Yuko
    CANCER NURSING, 2024, 47 (05) : 358 - 367
  • [44] Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review
    Iltis, Ana S.
    Rolf, Liz
    Yaeger, Lauren
    Goodman, Melody S.
    DuBois, James M.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2023, 32 (02) : 435 - 461
  • [45] A narrative overview of the patients' outcomes after multigene cancer panel testing, and a thorough evaluation of its implications for genetic counselling
    Esteban, I
    Lopez-Fernandez, A.
    Balmana, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2019, 62 (05) : 342 - 349
  • [46] Investigation of clinically relevant germline variants detected by next-generation sequencing in patients with childhood cancer: a review of the literature
    Sylvester, Dianne E.
    Chen, Yuyan
    Jamieson, Robyn V.
    Dalla-Pozza, Luciano
    Byrne, Jennifer A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2018, 55 (12) : 785 - 793
  • [47] Colon Cancer Screening Practices and Disclosure After Receipt of Positive or Inconclusive Genetic Test Results for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
    Ersig, Anne L.
    Hadley, Donald W.
    Koehly, Laura M.
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (18) : 4071 - 4079
  • [48] Impact of tumor heterogeneity and tissue sampling for genetic mutation testing: a systematic review and post hoc analysis
    Swift, Stephanie L.
    Duffy, Steve
    Lang, Shona H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 126 : 45 - 55
  • [49] Clinically Significant Germline Mutations in Cancer-Causing Genes Identified Through Research Studies Should Be Offered to Research Participants by Genetic Counselors
    Forrest, Laura E.
    Young, Mary-Anne
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (09) : 898 - +
  • [50] Is there evidence for a better health care for cancer patients after a second opinion? A systematic review
    Ruetters, Dana
    Keinki, Christian
    Schroth, Sarah
    Liebl, Patrick
    Huebner, Jutta
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 142 (07) : 1521 - 1528