Outcomes of Robotic MIDCAB With Hybrid PCI for Multivessel Coronary Disease Involving the Left Main: Results of 62 Cases

被引:0
|
作者
Naito, Noritsugu [1 ]
Ibrahim, Homam [2 ]
Staniloae, Cezar [2 ]
Razzouk, Louai [2 ]
Dorsey, Michael [1 ]
Grossi, Eugene [1 ]
Loulmet, Didier F. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, 530 First Ave,Suite 9V, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Cardiol, New York, NY USA
关键词
hybrid coronary revascularization; robotic MIDCAB; PCI; multivessel coronary disease; ARTERY-BYPASS; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; REVASCULARIZATION; INTERVENTION; STENOSIS; PATENCY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1177/15569845251324200
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Hybrid coronary revascularization is a clinical strategy that uses a combination of surgical revascularization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data on the hybrid approach for coronary artery disease involving the left main (LM) are scarce. We analyzed our cohort of hybrid coronary revascularizations with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) using robotic left internal mammary artery harvesting and PCI for multivessel disease with and without LM involvement.Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2020, 105 patients consecutively underwent robotic MIDCAB. Of those, 62 patients (59.1%) had multivessel coronary artery disease and underwent revascularization via the hybrid approach using robotic MIDCAB and PCI. Patients were then stratified into 2 groups for comparison: LM disease (n = 22, 35.5%) and non-LM disease (n = 40, 64.5%).Results: The SYNTAX scores were significantly lower in the non-LM group compared with the LM group (19.06 +/- 6.41 vs 24.86 +/- 7.04, P = 0.002). There were no other significant differences in demographics between the groups. There were no 30-day mortalities in either group. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 5 years was 72.2% in the non-LM group and 61.0% in the LM group (P = 0.89). There were no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (94.1% vs 83.3%, P = 0.074) or freedom from coronary reintervention (83.4% vs 75.4%, P = 0.699).Conclusions: Hybrid robotic MIDCAB for patients with and without LM disease can be performed with acceptable results in selected patients. However, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions regarding safety and efficacy compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Revascularization Strategies in Multivessel and Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: SYNTAX and Beyond
    Hahalis, George
    Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 55 (04) : 328 - 335
  • [22] Angiographic outcomes following stenting or coronary artery bypass surgery of the left main coronary artery: fifteen-month outcomes from the synergy between PCI with TAXUS express and cardiac surgery left main angiographic substudy (SYNTAX-LE MANS)
    Morice, Marie-Claude
    Feldman, Ted E.
    Mack, Michael J.
    Stahle, Elisabeth
    Holmes, David R.
    Colombo, Antonio
    Morel, Marie-Angele
    van den Brand, Marcel
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Mohr, Friedrich
    Carrie, Didier
    Fournial, Gerard
    James, Stefan
    Leadley, Katrin
    Dawkins, Keith D.
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2011, 7 (06) : 670 - 679
  • [23] Short-term clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for the treatment of multivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
    Hu, Fang-Bin
    Cui, Lian-Qun
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2015, 26 (06) : 526 - 534
  • [24] Left Main Coronary Artery Bifurcation Coronary Intervention in a Patient with Achondroplasia with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Das, Debasish
    Banerjee, Anindya
    Kumar, Abhinav
    Das, Tutan
    Singh, Shashikant
    Gupta, Jaideep Das
    Dixit, Manaranjan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SPECIALITIES, 2022, 13 (03) : 188 - 191
  • [25] PCI in Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Involving the Left Main Coronary Artery
    Mikhail, Philopatir
    Ishak, Mark
    Spina, Roberto
    Ford, Thomas J.
    Kull, Anthony
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (15) : 1939 - 1941
  • [26] Predictors of long-term outcomes after bypass grafting versus drug-eluting stent implantation for left main or multivessel coronary artery disease
    Chang, Mineok
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Cavalcante, Rafael
    Sotomi, Yohei
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    Han, Minkyu
    Park, Seong-Wook
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Park, Seung-Jung
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 90 (02) : 177 - 185
  • [27] Chronic coronary multi-vessel disease with left main artery stenosis: For PCI
    Hamm, C. W.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (13) : 626 - 626
  • [28] Much Ado About Nothing? CABG or PCI for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Giri, Jay
    Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 149 (17) : 1339 - 1340
  • [29] A patient with multivessel or left main coronary disease - a candidate for coronary artery bypass grafting or coronary stenting
    Deptuch, Tornau W.
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2007, 3 (02): : 88 - 90
  • [30] Left main coronary artery disease: when and how to perform PCI?
    Chiarito, Mauro
    Mehilli, Julinda
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2020, 68 (05): : 405 - 414