Outcomes of Robotic MIDCAB With Hybrid PCI for Multivessel Coronary Disease Involving the Left Main: Results of 62 Cases

被引:0
|
作者
Naito, Noritsugu [1 ]
Ibrahim, Homam [2 ]
Staniloae, Cezar [2 ]
Razzouk, Louai [2 ]
Dorsey, Michael [1 ]
Grossi, Eugene [1 ]
Loulmet, Didier F. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, 530 First Ave,Suite 9V, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Cardiol, New York, NY USA
关键词
hybrid coronary revascularization; robotic MIDCAB; PCI; multivessel coronary disease; ARTERY-BYPASS; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; REVASCULARIZATION; INTERVENTION; STENOSIS; PATENCY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1177/15569845251324200
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Hybrid coronary revascularization is a clinical strategy that uses a combination of surgical revascularization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data on the hybrid approach for coronary artery disease involving the left main (LM) are scarce. We analyzed our cohort of hybrid coronary revascularizations with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) using robotic left internal mammary artery harvesting and PCI for multivessel disease with and without LM involvement.Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2020, 105 patients consecutively underwent robotic MIDCAB. Of those, 62 patients (59.1%) had multivessel coronary artery disease and underwent revascularization via the hybrid approach using robotic MIDCAB and PCI. Patients were then stratified into 2 groups for comparison: LM disease (n = 22, 35.5%) and non-LM disease (n = 40, 64.5%).Results: The SYNTAX scores were significantly lower in the non-LM group compared with the LM group (19.06 +/- 6.41 vs 24.86 +/- 7.04, P = 0.002). There were no other significant differences in demographics between the groups. There were no 30-day mortalities in either group. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 5 years was 72.2% in the non-LM group and 61.0% in the LM group (P = 0.89). There were no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (94.1% vs 83.3%, P = 0.074) or freedom from coronary reintervention (83.4% vs 75.4%, P = 0.699).Conclusions: Hybrid robotic MIDCAB for patients with and without LM disease can be performed with acceptable results in selected patients. However, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions regarding safety and efficacy compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coronary anatomy and comorbidities impact on elective PCI outcomes in left main and multivessel coronary artery disease
    Yager, Neil
    Schulman-Marcus, Joshua
    Torosoff, Mikhail
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 98 (03) : 436 - 444
  • [2] Hybrid revascularisation in a patient with multivessel and left main coronary disease
    Tajstra, Mateusz
    Gasior, Mariusz
    Filipiak, Krzysztof
    Zembala, Michal
    Hrapkowicz, Tomasz
    Hawranek, Michal
    Kazik, Anna
    Polonski, Lech
    Zembala, Marian
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2011, 69 (03) : 270 - 273
  • [3] Recent Evidence on Advances in PCI Treatment for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Jin, Xian
    Niu, Kaifan
    Shen, Chengxing
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (11)
  • [4] Comparing outcomes between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with left main or multivessel disease
    Kirov, Hristo
    Caldonazo, Tulio
    Riedel, Leoni Lu
    Tasoudis, Panagiotis
    Moschovas, Alexandros
    Diab, Mahmoud
    Faerber, Gloria
    Doenst, Torsten
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [5] Hybrid coronary revascularization: Midterm outcomes of robotic multivessel bypass and percutaneous interventions
    Kitahara, Hiroto
    Hirai, Taishi
    McCrorey, Mackenzie
    Patel, Brooke
    Nisivaco, Sarah
    Nathan, Sandeep
    Balkhy, Husam H.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 157 (05) : 1829 - +
  • [6] Midterm Outcomes of Simultaneous Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Hu, Sheng-shou
    Xiong, Hui
    Zheng, Zhe
    Gao, Peixian
    Zhang, Changwei
    Gao, Runlin
    Li, Lihuan
    Yuan, Jinqing
    Xu, Bo
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2012, 15 (01) : E18 - E22
  • [7] Clinical outcomes after PCI for acute coronary syndrome in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: insights from the Swiss Acute Left Main Coronary Vessel Percutaneous Management (SALVage) study
    Puricel, Serban
    Adorjan, Patrick
    Oberhaensli, Markus
    Stauffer, Jean-Christophe
    Moschovitis, Aris
    Vogel, Rolf
    Goy, Jean-Jacques
    Mueller, Olivier
    Eeckhout, Eric
    Togni, Mario
    Wenaweser, Peter
    Meier, Bernhard
    Windecker, Stephan
    Cook, Stephane
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2011, 7 (06) : 697 - 704
  • [8] Impact of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease With Versus Without Left Main Coronary Artery Disease on Long-Term Mortality After Coronary Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation
    Chang, Mineok
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Cavalcante, Rafael
    Sotomi, Yohei
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Kang, Soo-Jin
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Kim, Young-Hak
    Park, Seong-Wook
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Park, Seung-Jung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (02) : 225 - 230
  • [9] The Outcomes of Percutaneous RevascularizaTIon for Management of SUrgically Ineligible Patients With Multivessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (OPTIMUM) Registry: Rationale and Design
    Salisbury, Adam C.
    Kirtane, Ajay J.
    Ali, Ziad A.
    Grantham, J. Aaron
    Lombardi, William L.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    Genereux, Philippe
    Allen, Keith B.
    Brown, W. Morris
    Nugent, Karen
    Gosch, Kensey L.
    Karmpaliotis, Dimitri
    Spertus, John A.
    Kandzari, David E.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 41 : 83 - 91
  • [10] Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease
    Stone, G. W.
    Kappetein, A. P.
    Sabik, J. F.
    Pocock, S. J.
    Morice, M. -C.
    Puskas, J.
    Kandzari, D. E.
    Karmpaliotis, D.
    Brown, W. M., III
    Lembo, N. J.
    Banning, A.
    Merkely, B.
    Horkay, F.
    Boonstra, P. W.
    van Boven, A. J.
    Ungi, I.
    Bogats, G.
    Mansour, S.
    Noiseux, N.
    Sabate, M.
    Pomar, J.
    Hickey, M.
    Gershlick, A.
    Buszman, P. E.
    Bochenek, A.
    Schampaert, E.
    Page, P.
    Modolo, R.
    Gregson, J.
    Simonton, C. A.
    Mehran, R.
    Kosmidou, I.
    Genereux, P.
    Crowley, A.
    Dressler, O.
    Serruys, P. W.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (19) : 1820 - 1830