Consensus in the weighted voter model with noise-free and noisy observations

被引:0
作者
Ganesh, Ayalvadi [1 ]
Hauert, Sabine [2 ]
Valla, Emma [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Math, Bristol BS8 1UG, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Engn Math & Technol, Bristol, England
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Consensus; Weighted voter model; Decentralised decision-making;
D O I
10.1007/s11721-025-00248-z
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Collective decision-making is an important problem in swarm robotics arising in many different contexts and applications. The Weighted Voter Model has been proposed to collectively solve the best-of-n problem, and analysed in the thermodynamic limit. We present an exact finite-population analysis of the best-of-two model on complete as well as regular network topologies. We also present a novel analysis of this model when agent evaluations of options suffer from measurement error. Our analytical results allow us to predict the expected outcome of best-of-two decision-making on a swarm system without having to do extensive simulations or numerical computations. We show that the error probability of reaching consensus on a suboptimal solution is bounded away from 1 even if only a single agent is initialised with the better option, irrespective of the total number of agents. Moreover, the error probability tends to zero if the number of agents initialised with the best solution tends to infinity, however slowly compared to the total number of agents. Finally, we present bounds and approximations for the best-of-n problem.
引用
收藏
页数:42
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Universality of fixation probabilities in randomly structured populations
    Adlam, Ben
    Nowak, Martin A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
  • [2] Blender T, 2016, IEEE IND ELEC, P6879, DOI 10.1109/IECON.2016.7793638
  • [3] THE ISOPERIMETRIC NUMBER OF RANDOM REGULAR GRAPHS
    BOLLOBAS, B
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS, 1988, 9 (03) : 241 - 244
  • [4] Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective
    Brambilla, Manuele
    Ferrante, Eliseo
    Birattari, Mauro
    Dorigo, Marco
    [J]. SWARM INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 7 (01) : 1 - 41
  • [5] Statistical physics of social dynamics
    Castellano, Claudio
    Fortunato, Santo
    Loreto, Vittorio
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81 (02) : 591 - 646
  • [6] Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey
    Conradt, Larissa
    List, Christian
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 364 (1518) : 719 - 742
  • [7] Uninformed Individuals Promote Democratic Consensus in Animal Groups
    Couzin, Iain D.
    Ioannou, Christos C.
    Demirel, Gueven
    Gross, Thilo
    Torney, Colin J.
    Hartnett, Andrew
    Conradt, Larissa
    Levin, Simon A.
    Leonard, Naomi E.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6062) : 1578 - 1580
  • [8] Crosscombe M, 2017, IEEE INT C INT ROBOT, P4326, DOI 10.1109/IROS.2017.8206297
  • [9] Probabilistic consensus via polling and majority rules
    Cruise, James
    Ganesh, Ayalvadi
    [J]. QUEUEING SYSTEMS, 2014, 78 (02) : 99 - 120
  • [10] Diestel R., 2005, GRAPH THEORY, V3