The Effects of Real-Time Feedback on Effort and Performance: Evidence from a Natural Quasi-Experiment

被引:0
作者
Margolin, Maximilian [1 ]
Reimer, Marko [2 ]
Schaupp, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] WHU Otto Beisheim Sch Management, Inst Management Accounting & Control, D-56179 Vallendar, Germany
关键词
feedback; decision support; decision control; quasi-experiment; sports data; IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; ASSISTANT REFEREES; SEEKING BEHAVIOR; FIELD EXPERIMENT; SELF; PRESSURE; INCENTIVES; CHOKING; ANXIETY; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2022.02084
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
New digital technologies allow companies to provide employees with performance feedback in real time. We investigate the causal effects of such real-time feedback on individual effort and the quality of initial (prefeedback) and final (post feedback) decisions by exploiting a natural quasi-experiment in the setting of professional soccer refereeing. Our results suggest that real-time feedback has differential effects for experienced compared with inexperienced agents. Specifically, we find some evidence that experienced agents decrease their effort under real-time feedback without harming the quality of their initial decisions. This results in better final decisions because real-time feedback allows agents to correct wrong initial decisions upon feedback. In contrast, inexperienced agents increase their effort, but make worse initial decisions. Upon feedback, they manage to compensate for their increased number of wrong initial decisions, but see no improvement in the quality of final decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:3558 / 3582
页数:26
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [11] Baldassarre L, 2015, Harvard Bus. Rev.August 12
  • [13] More on the fragility of performance: Choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving
    Beilock, SL
    Kulp, CA
    Holt, LE
    Carr, TH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (04) : 584 - 600
  • [14] Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
    Bénabou, R
    Tirole, J
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2003, 70 (03) : 489 - 520
  • [15] Do First Impressions Last? The Impact of Initial Assessments and Subsequent Performance on Promotion Decisions
    Black, Dirk E.
    Vance, Marshall D.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (07) : 4556 - 4576
  • [16] Gathering Data for Archival, Field, Survey, and Experimental Accounting Research
    Bloomfield, Robert
    Nelson, Mark W.
    Soltes, Eugene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (02) : 341 - 395
  • [17] Impression Management in Organizations: Critical Questions, Answers, and Areas for Future Research
    Bolino, Mark
    Long, David
    Turnley, William
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 3, 2016, 3 : 377 - 406
  • [18] A Multi-Level Review of Impression Management Motives and Behaviors
    Bolino, Mark C.
    Kacmar, K. Michele
    Tumley, William H.
    Gilstrap, J. Bruce
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2008, 34 (06) : 1080 - 1109
  • [19] Cadman BD, 2023, Working paper
  • [20] The Learning Effects of Monitoring
    Campbell, Dennis
    Epstein, Marc J.
    Martinez-Jerez, F. Asis
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 86 (06) : 1909 - 1934