Spatiotemporal analysis of AGB and BGB in China: Responses to climate change under SSP scenarios

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Chuanmei [1 ]
Li, Yupu [1 ]
Ding, Jianli [2 ,3 ]
Rao, Jiexin [1 ]
Xiang, Yihang [1 ]
Ge, Xiangyu [1 ]
Wang, Jinjie [1 ]
Wang, Jingzhe [4 ]
Chen, Xiangyue [5 ]
Zhang, Zipeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Geog & Remote Sensing Sci, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Inst Technol, Aksu 843099, Peoples R China
[3] Xinjiang Univ, Inst Beautiful China, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China
[4] Shenzhen Polytech Univ, Sch Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[5] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Earth Sci & Spatial Informat Engn, Xiangtan 411201, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Aboveground biomass; Belowground biomass; Ecosystem; Shared socioeconomic pathways; Climate change; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS; ROOT BIOMASS; NET PRIMARY; SENSITIVITY; PREDICTION; PATTERNS; GROWTH; STOCKS; POOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102038
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Aboveground biomass (AGB) and belowground biomass (BGB) are key components of carbon storage, yet their responses to future climate changes remain poorly understood, particularly in China. Understanding these dynamics is essential for global carbon cycle modeling and ecosystem management. This study integrates field observations, machine learning, and multi-source remote sensing data to reconstruct the distributions of AGB and BGB in China from 2000 to 2020. Then CMIP6 was used to predict the distribution of China under three SSP scenarios (SSP1-1.9, SSP2-4.5, SSP5-8.5) from 2020 to 2100 to fill the existing knowledge gap. The predictive accuracy for AGB (R2 = 0.85) was significantly higher than for BGB (R2 = 0.48), likely due to the greater complexity of modeling belowground dynamics. NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) and soil organic carbon density (SOC) were identified as the primary drivers of AGB and BGB changes. During 2000-2020, AGB in China remained stable at approximately 10.69 Pg C, while BGB was around 5.06 Pg C. Forest ecosystems contributed 88.52% of AGB and 43.83% of BGB. AGB showed a relatively slow annual increase, while BGB demonstrated a significant annual growth rate of approximately 37 Tg C yr-1. Under the low-emission scenario, both AGB and BGB show fluctuations and steady growth, particularly in South China and the northwestern part of Northeast China. Under the moderate-emission scenario, AGB and BGB show significant declines and increases, respectively. In the high-emission scenario, both AGB and BGB decline significantly, particularly in the southwestern and central regions. These results provide valuable insights into ecosystem carbon dynamics under climate change, emphasizing the relatively low responsiveness of AGB and BGB to climatic variability, and offering guidance for sustainable land use and management strategies. (c) 2025 China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Geosciences (Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling the Climate Suitability of Northernmost Mangroves in China under Climate Change Scenarios
    Wang, Yuyu
    Dong, Peng
    Hu, Wenjia
    Chen, Guangcheng
    Zhang, Dian
    Chen, Bin
    Lei, Guangchun
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (01):
  • [2] Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Resilience and Resistance of Global Vegetation Responses to Climate Change
    Sun, Na
    Liu, Naijing
    Zhao, Xiang
    Zhao, Jiacheng
    Wang, Haoyu
    Wu, Donghai
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [3] Dynamics of invasive alien plant species in China under climate change scenarios
    Tu, Wenqin
    Xiong, Qinli
    Qiu, Xiaoping
    Zhang, Yongmei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129
  • [5] Mapping Impacts of Climate Change on the Distributions of Two Endemic Tree Species under Socioeconomic Pathway Scenarios (SSP)
    HamadAmin, Barham A.
    Khwarahm, Nabaz R.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [6] Contrasting responses of spatiotemporal patterns of cropland to climate change in Northeast China
    Yu, Ziyang
    Li, Zhenzhen
    Yang, Haoxuan
    Wang, Yihao
    Cui, Yang
    Lei, Guoping
    Ye, Shuai
    FOOD SECURITY, 2023, 15 (05) : 1197 - 1214
  • [7] Modelling soybean yield responses to seeding date under projected climate change scenarios
    Jing, Q.
    Huffman, T.
    Shang, J.
    Liu, J.
    Pattey, E.
    Morrison, M.
    Jego, G.
    Qian, B.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 97 (06) : 1152 - 1164
  • [8] Contrasting responses of spatiotemporal patterns of cropland to climate change in Northeast China
    Ziyang Yu
    Zhenzhen Li
    Haoxuan Yang
    Yihao Wang
    Yang Cui
    Guoping Lei
    Shuai Ye
    Food Security, 2023, 15 : 1197 - 1214
  • [9] Forest Carbon Sequestration Potential in China under Different SSP-RCP Scenarios
    Chou, Jieming
    Hao, Yidan
    Xu, Yuan
    Zhao, Weixing
    Li, Yuanmeng
    Jin, Haofeng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [10] Temporal and spatial patterns of extreme heat on wheat in China under climate change scenarios
    Chen, Heyu
    Yue, Yaojie
    Jiang, Qinghua
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2024, 226