Smart fertigation effects on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield, nutrient uptake and soil health

被引:0
作者
Aathithyan, C. [1 ]
Gurusamy, A. [1 ]
Subramanian, E. [2 ]
Hemalatha, G. [3 ]
Kumutha, K. [4 ]
Saliha, B. A. Bhakiyathu [5 ]
Kamalesh, S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Agr Coll & Res Inst AC&RI, Dept Agron, Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Indian Council Agr Res ICAR Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Community Sci Coll & Res Inst CSC&RI, Dept Food Policy & Publ Hlth Nutr, Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Agr Coll & Res Inst AC&RI, Dept Agr Microbiol, Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu, India
[5] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Agr Res Stn, Kovilpatti 628501, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Velammal Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Informat Technol, Madurai 625009, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
PLANT SCIENCE TODAY | 2025年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
enzyme activities; groundnut; microbial population; nutrient uptake; sensors; smart fertigation; yield; WATER PRODUCTIVITY; DRIP IRRIGATION; USE EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.14719/pst.7007
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Precise application of water and nutrients is crucial for sustainable groundnut cultivation. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of smart fertigation systems on groundnut yield, nutrient uptake, soil microbial population and soil enzyme activities. The experiments were conducted at two locations. Location I was at a farmer's field in Kanjipatti village, Kalaiyarkoil block, Sivagangai district, Tamil Nadu (rabi 2023) and Location II was at the Central Farm of the Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai district, Tamil Nadu (summer2024). Field trials were laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised three drip irrigation methods in the main plots, namely; conventional drip irrigation (M1), time-based automated drip irrigation (M2) and sensor-based automated drip irrigation (M3) and five drip fertigation methods in the subplots, viz., drip fertigation of 75% RDF (F1), drip fertigation of 100% RDF (F2), STCR-based drip fertigation (F3), sensor-based fertigation at 75% NPK level (F4) and sensor-based fertigation at 100% NPK level (F5). The results revealed that pod yield, total NPK uptake, pod uptake, haulm uptake, microbial population and enzyme activities were significantly higher with the combination of sensor-based automated drip irrigation and sensor-based fertigation at 100% NPK level (M3F5). The M3F5 treatment increased crop yield by 44-45%, dehydrogenase activity by 44-64% and phosphatase activity by 57-65% across both seasons compared to M1F1. However, the post-harvest available nutrient status was recorded higher with conventional drip irrigation combined with drip fertigation of 100% RDF (M1F2). Based on the experimental results, it can be concluded that sensor-based automated drip irrigation combined with sensor-based fertigation at 100% NPK level (M3F5) enhanced groundnut yield, nutrient uptake, microbial population and enzyme activities.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of Genetic Variability for Yield and Yield-Contributing Traits in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes
    Yami, Abera Seboka
    Abtew, Wosene Gebreselassie
    JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY, 2025, 2025 (01)
  • [42] Effects of temperature and photoperiod on vegetative and reproductive growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Nigam, SN
    Rao, RCN
    Wynne, JC
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 1998, 181 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [43] Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars to integrated nutrient management on productivity, profitability and nutrient uptake in NEH Region
    Baishya, L. K.
    Ansari, M. A.
    Singh, Roben
    Deka, B. C.
    Prakash, N.
    Ngachan, S. V.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2014, 84 (05): : 612 - 615
  • [44] Aspergillus and aflatoxin in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and groundnut cake in Eastern Ethiopia
    Mohammed, Abdi
    Chala, Alemayehu
    Dejene, Mashilla
    Fininsa, Chemeda
    Hoisington, David A.
    Sobolev, Victor S.
    Arias, Renee S.
    FOOD ADDITIVES & CONTAMINANTS PART B-SURVEILLANCE, 2016, 9 (04): : 290 - 298
  • [45] GENETIC DIVERGENCE IN CONFECTIONARY TYPES OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)
    Venkateswarlu, O.
    Sudhakar, B. V. G.
    Sekhar, M. Reddi
    Sukhakar, P.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2011, 34 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [46] Inheritance of rust resistance in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Jakkeral, Shridevi A.
    Nadaf, H. L.
    Gowda, M. V. C.
    Bhat, R. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 2013, 73 (04) : 450 - 453
  • [47] Effect of main and second cropping on protein and oil concentrations and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Sogut, Tahsin
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (02): : 599 - 602
  • [48] Comparative assessment using Glomus mosseae and NPK fertigation to evaluate its role in enhancing growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea. L)
    Pawar, Prerna Balkrishna
    Khadilkar, Jayshri Pramod
    Kulkarni, Mohan Vinayak
    Melo, Jose Savio
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2020, 43 (11) : 1697 - 1711
  • [49] GENETIC VARIABILITY STUDIES FOR YIELD, YIELD ATTRIBUTES AND. RESISTANCE TO FOLIAR DISEASES IN GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)
    Vishnuvardhan, K. Mohan
    Vasanthi, R. P.
    Reddy, K. Hariprasad
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2013, 36 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [50] Influence ofNano Formulation on Augmenting the Seed Quality in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Tamilarasan, C.
    Raja, K.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2024, 47 (01) : 14 - 19